@NoMAIG hmmm getting a little bit angry? cursing only shows your true character. Of course you are looking for someone to hate, typical media consumer. I'm not going to continue having this conversation with a brick wall. Thanks for the comments and views.
@NoMAIG Well then you don't live in America, and are only listening to what the media is feeding you. Grand Jury report so far says Paterno followed the correct course of action. He didn't witness it. If you want to put someone on the stake, look to McQueery. He is the witness. Stop including pointless things in your argument like "if it were my son" or "bob stoops blah blah blah."
@NoMAIG You "KNOW?" Pretty bold words considering the Grand Jury doesn't even know. Are you psychic? I'm not defending child rape, only Joe Paterno. How can you take action against things if you don't know. Remember, innocent until proven guilty. My prayers go out as well to those who have been affected by Sandusky's heinous actions. Also, don't words in my mouth. If Bob Stoops was in question I'd give him the same respect as Paterno.
@NoMAIG neither you nor anyone else knows what Joe knows or doesn't know. stop assuming he supports rapists when thats what the media is feeding to you.
@evilbob2200 Considering the relationship between Paterno and Sandusky, and the fact that Sandusky was targeted by Ray Gricar for investigation at the time, it is preposterous to suppose that Paterno had no knowledge of Sanduskies proclivities. The 2002 incident renders Paterno's decision to wash his hands of the matter even more negligent. Privacy protection does not apply in this case, since a Class A Felony sexual assault was committed, not some petty institutional violation.
@NoMAIG I would really love to understand how you know what Joe knew
Americanrjt 3 months ago
@NoMAIG There is a lot of debate around that. I'm done with you.
elgrau1 3 months ago
@NoMAIG You idiot, even the victims support Joe Paterno! of course I would support him until he is proven guilty...
elgrau1 3 months ago
@NoMAIG hmmm getting a little bit angry? cursing only shows your true character. Of course you are looking for someone to hate, typical media consumer. I'm not going to continue having this conversation with a brick wall. Thanks for the comments and views.
elgrau1 3 months ago
@NoMAIG Well then you don't live in America, and are only listening to what the media is feeding you. Grand Jury report so far says Paterno followed the correct course of action. He didn't witness it. If you want to put someone on the stake, look to McQueery. He is the witness. Stop including pointless things in your argument like "if it were my son" or "bob stoops blah blah blah."
elgrau1 3 months ago
@NoMAIG You "KNOW?" Pretty bold words considering the Grand Jury doesn't even know. Are you psychic? I'm not defending child rape, only Joe Paterno. How can you take action against things if you don't know. Remember, innocent until proven guilty. My prayers go out as well to those who have been affected by Sandusky's heinous actions. Also, don't words in my mouth. If Bob Stoops was in question I'd give him the same respect as Paterno.
elgrau1 3 months ago
@NoMAIG neither you nor anyone else knows what Joe knows or doesn't know. stop assuming he supports rapists when thats what the media is feeding to you.
elgrau1 3 months ago
@mrwrite2011 im a jew ass hole and i support joe
evilbob2200 3 months ago
@djs259 no
evilbob2200 3 months ago
@evilbob2200 Considering the relationship between Paterno and Sandusky, and the fact that Sandusky was targeted by Ray Gricar for investigation at the time, it is preposterous to suppose that Paterno had no knowledge of Sanduskies proclivities. The 2002 incident renders Paterno's decision to wash his hands of the matter even more negligent. Privacy protection does not apply in this case, since a Class A Felony sexual assault was committed, not some petty institutional violation.
djs259 3 months ago