Ion Wind Lifter

HOW IT WORKS:
The simple explanation:
you have a two terminals with a 25k volt potential across them. The air near the tiny "corona" wire turns the air around it ionic. This newly charged ion air, then rushes towards the aluminum skirt (which is at the opposite charge.)..this is the "ion wind". The moving wind, brings new air near the tiny wire, which again becomes ionic, and the whole cycle repeats.
The more complicated explanation:
The two terminals have a 25k V potential between them. One of the terminals is MUCH smaller than the other. Thus, if since both are charged to the same level, the small wire will have a MUCH steeper electric field gradient around it, than the aluminum skirt will (its electric field gradient is smoother). So, in sum, the smaller wire rips ions (because of its steep electric field gradient) far more fast and readily than the aluminum skirt does. So there is a surplus of ions around the top of the craft, these ions don't stick around long, and rush towards the bottom skirt immediately. This is the "ion wind". The whole cycle repeats...and voila..lift/thrust.
NOTE: it does NOT matter if you change the top to negative, and the bottom to positive, or vice versa, you still get ion wind going downward. The ion wind is created by the smaller wire being able to rip ions more readily than the skirt, and it is independent of charge.

A MESSAGE TO THOSE WHO THINK ITS NOT ION WIND:
it's not "anti-gravity"...or "electrogravitics"....all the internet scholars need to stfu, it's just ion-wind...it's a VERY normal thing in electromagnetic theory. It's just that someone arranged a ion wind generator in the shape of a hovercraft, and now ever 13 year old and 45 year old non-physicist/non-engineers all think its a "UFO"!!! or btter yet...that it's "electrogravitics"..hahahah.

So, no...don't tease yourself there is no government conspiracy, life is much more boring that you suspect...it's just ion win.

This thing does NOT work in a high-vacuum (that is, a chamber that has had nearly all the air molecules sucked out). High-vacuums are VERY hard to create, and usually only physics labs have them....But guess what???? some physcists/engineers went ahead and used their highly sophisticated equipment to show that lifters do not, in fact, work when there is no air around to be charged. ....so no, its not "anti-gravity"...it really is just ion win.

Here is the link showing a lifter in high-vacuum:
http://www.blazelabs.com/l-vacuum.asp

and here is another link showing this "government supressed super secret technology" being used TO COOL FUCKING LAPTOPS...
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ionic-cooling-fanless,7868.html
(see! its really not that amazing when you take it out of the UFO configuration)

Now, if anyone wants to build one, just google it. There's ton of intructions online...but becareful to ignore all the 'anti-gravity' banters...its annoying.

If anyone wants to learn Electrodynamics and how this stuff all works, I highly reccomend this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Electrodynamics-3rd-David-Griffiths/dp/013...
(you can find a pdf copy on torrents sites...the book does require a good understanding of calculus, so make sure you know that well...it teaches you all the vector mechanics you need to know)

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• lifter
• ufo
• electrostatic
• ion
• wind

[HorizonDelta]

Good effects !

[eblue762]

How were you able to use a computer as a power source?? Please answer thanks

[CombatGuru]

this is still damned cool. either one of you nerds can admit that.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@entropy111111 Blaze had some kid of error, because electrostatics works in vacuum. THat is the theory behind vacuum tubes. PLUS, there is no air in the resin/epoxy encsed discs. I am no wrong, because I have done the research. Your research is incomplete. US ARMY and university research (Purdue Energy conversion Lab), and TT Brown's own work, Plus John Fiala prove that ion wind is too negligible a force to be of any value. But the Biefeld Brown effect cancels inertia, and is EXPONENTIAL ^ Volts

[entropy111111]

@Beamshipcaptain you know damn well that blaze labs didnt have any grounding errors. That is a very well done experiment. And no, youre still wrong...if there is ANY air inside a bag, you can speed air particles around, which will carry momentum, and you'll have thrust. Think of the earths atmostphere as one giant "bag"...planes still work inside...youre analysis is way off base. New question: if you knew you were wrong, would you admit it.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@entropy111111 Then they grounded the container or some other error. In 1955 in Paris France, the concept was proven with a billionth of an atmosphere. Same thing in 1959, a couple miles from her in King of Prussia, PA. Google ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICS. If no wind can excape the bag, or expxy, you should have no thrust. Instead there is the same thrust, in REVERSE direction. The Effect also cancels out all inertia. Instant satrts and stops and changes of direction at any speed, with no sensation.

[entropy111111]

@Beamshipcaptain hahaha....again...who gives a shit if "no wind" can escape a plastic bag, you still have air in there that becomes ionic, and thrust towards the skirt. there is a momentum transfer providing thrust regardless if there is a plastic bag around it... respond to the Blazerlabs trial...they used a nice vacuum set up...thats a REAL vacuum. Ive worked with those...it takes like a week to remove all the air. and lo and behold...NO THRUST IN VACUUM.

[Beamshipcaptain]

@entropy111111 No wind can escape a plastic bag. A youtuber even encased TT Brwon discs in epoxy, and they flew backwards also. No wind can escape expxy either. Purdue University, and the US Army showed wirhAlgebra why ion wind is over three orders of magnitude too feeble to cause levitation., Those are also ACTUAL scientists. Takaaki Musha (HONDA R & D) another ACTUAL SCIENTIST showed it works more efficietly in vacuum. NASA even showed it works better in vacuum, their videos are on Youtube.

[entropy111111]

@Beamshipcaptain dude... plastic bags still have air in them...who cares if you put them in some bags....as for john fiala...really..show me the results...cause the guys at blaze labs (google: lifter in vacuum (or see my video description for the link) and NASA..and whole bunch of ACTUAL scientists that get paid to do science proved youre full of it

[Beamshipcaptain]

@entropy111111 "Dude", ion wind has an upper limit, and that limit is over 3 orders of magnitude too feeble to cause levitation. The effect is more efficient in vacuum, because cuurrent can be turend way down and there is no corona to rob efficiency. I sealed up TT Brown saucers in platic and they flew backwards, in 2000. A youTuber sent be a vieo of TT Brown saucers he sealed in epoxy and they also flew backwards. Scientist John Fiala flew my Beamships in vacuum, and with onboard power.