In summer 2004, citizens who peacefully protested during the Republican National Convention in New York City were subject to mass arrest, lengthy detention under horrible conditions and a wide range of other civil liberties violations. Civil liberties exist, much of the time, to protect minority rights, and that's important. But most of these protesters, in opposing the war and other Bush policies, were expressing the views of New York City's majority. If such mainstream dissent is punished severely, many wondered, what lies in store for those expressing unpopular opinions?
the CORPERATION OF THE UNITED STATES dose not repect the contitution.
IT is Banker's law these day,The law of the sea.Jordon Maxwell the Two laws check it out
eddiedaskull 2 years ago
85% of those people proly deserved it
redFiretrUCK65 3 years ago
yeah jordan when you gonna stop suckin dick long enough to do that? lol
daddysoulmanrich 3 years ago
get a job, earn enough cash and go. plenty of people willing to take your place here.
wastedbandwidth 3 years ago
does that mean that the constitution supports the death of children?
adelma01 3 years ago
So who is supporting terrorism, the person quoting Thomas Jefferson or Thomas Jefferson? I'm not trying to advocate these hippies' argument of "spreading awareness" (read: talking and doing nothing) but your supremely "right" stance of fear mongering by making unsound logical leaps is just as much of a crackpot approach to political discussion. Think about what you are trying to say, please. If I wear a shirt with the entire constitution printed on it and blow up a children's hospital,
adelma01 3 years ago
guess gov docs are rumors?
amerakita 3 years ago
i agree...
freedomfighter88 3 years ago
silly liberals. This is comedy gold.
jimmynorton10 4 years ago 2
That will not help the problem
backslash2k3 4 years ago