APOLLO 12's COVERT EVA - Proof of NASA's Off-The-Record Lunar Surface Operations

Hello Everyone. Firstly, I do realize that this is a rather long video - certainly much longer than any of my other videos on Youtube. The purpose of this presentation however is to provide a deeper, comprehensive examination into the considerable evidence that surrounds one very specific classified incident that took place during the Apollo 12 mission, with this in-depth analysis demonstrating conclusively to you that this covert event I am describing absolutely did take place and was indeed covered up by NASA in an effort to keep the world forever ignorant of the fact that it had ever even occurred.

During the November 1969 flight of Apollo 12, Mission Commander Charles "Pete" Conrad and Lunar Module Pilot Alan Bean touched down on the Moon at a landing site known as "Statio Cognitium" ("Known Base"), located near the eastern edge of Oceanus Procellarum - the "Ocean of Storms".

NASA's official historical record for that second lunar landing mission has always publicly declared that the pair of astronauts conducted two EVAs during their 31.5 hour stay on the lunar surface. Today however, we will closely examine some highly relevant and extremely revealing official archive evidence that will demonstrate to you that NASA's official claim that only two EVAs were conducted during Apollo 12 is a LIE.

The truth is that after they landed at Statio Cognitium but prior to carrying out their two declared moonwalks, astronauts Conrad and Bean first conducted an entirely covert, classified Standup-EVA, journeying outside the pressurized security of their Lunar Module without the public ever knowing about it. Most shockingly, you will see that NASA has even accidentally acknowledged in recently published official archive documentation that this totally off-the-record, clandestine SEVA I am describing did in fact take place during the Apollo 12 mission - blatantly admitting not only that it happened, but even telling us when and why it was conducted!

In this presentation, I have attempted to explain the relevant evidence about this covert, off-the-record operation in such a way that even those who may not be entirely familiar with the technology and techniques involved in Apollo lunar surface operations will still be able to appreciate not only how and why NASA did this covert S-EVA during Apollo 12, but also understand just how the space agency was able to keep the global public totally ignorant of the fact that this clandestine lunar surface operation was ever even taking place.

SOME RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION
Here are some links to a few of the NASA archive documents that I reference in this presentation in case you wish to verify them and examine them yourselves.

Here is a link leading to the official Apollo 12 voice transcription documentation in the NASA/JSC archives. The various official mission transcripts offered here are categorized by mission and are all in PDF format.
http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/history/mission_trans/apollo12.htm

Here is the link to the "Apollo Lunar Surface Journal" homepage for the Apollo 12 mission, where some of the relevant audio files and transcript evidence that we examine in this presentation can also be found.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12j.html

Also, here is the direct link to the full "Apollo Experience Lessons Learned for Constellation Lunar Dust Management" document from the "NASA archives that I reference in this presentation. On page 9 of this document, NASA blatantly acknowledges that this covert Standup-EVA I describe did indeed take place during the November 1969 Apollo 12 mission to Statio Cognitium.
http://next.nasa.gov/alsj/TP-2006-213726.pdf

Here is another copy of the same document that I uploaded to Scribd, just in case the NASA archive link changes.
http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/69845364?access_key=key-1rjq8fiil2jq1rwgj1nl

Cheers everyone,
LunaCognita

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Apollo
• 12
• covert
• EVA
• SEVA
• S-EVA
• Standup
• space
• NASA
• Conrad
• Bean
• ascent
• descent
• landing
• 16mm
• DAC
• Data
• Acquisition
• Camera
• archives
• liftoff
• perspective
• rotation
• 70mm
• hasselblad
• TV
• GCTA
• DOD
• conspiracy
• forensic
• moon
• lunar
• alien
• anomalies
• transient
• anomaly
• aliens
• LTP
• UFO
• UFOS
• ET
• hoax
• lie
• cropping
• pyramid
• extraterrestrial
• coverup
• shuttle
• mars
• lunacognita
• luna
• cognita
• Gemini
• Skylab
• Mir
• ISS
• Zond
• Soviet
• Russian
• ISRO
• China
• ESA
• USGS
• conspiracies
• NWO
• newworldorder
• vector
• chevron

[znblue]

Another video from LunaCognita that is nothing short of excellence. Your research is superb. Providing the official documentation was icing on the cake. Bravo!

[terrygalam]

Very thorough and well done sir. The frustrating part is that American tax dollars are used to pay for all of this, surely we deserve the absolute truth as to what they find out there. Who are they to dictate to us what information we can or can't handle? I just want the truth. Keep up the great work Luna, any update on the 'UFOs in Outer Space' vid?

[emerald1one1]

no prob with your video , what would you do , thousand of kids watched on black+white+grey~! tv, classrooms, families, gees an oops=a crater edge landing verse spot designated .sure get out of the top hatch ,dust or not . view the surrounding=good thinking.= like is the ladder in a relative safe walk off onto moon surface or omg ? there is a big drop off (medic?) the astronauts are amazing pilots, nothing will change that .

[TheRichard991]

Outstanding.



[potluckpotatoes]

So the 2nd trip to the moon was a little dustier then the 1st one while landing on the surface so they couldn't get a good look at the surrounding area while coming down. So before they start there missions they pop there head out the top for a look around to make sure there not going to step into a deep, dark, freezing creator. This later became slandered on 15 being pre-planned on the ground cause by this point they know the dust blocks there view while landing... Why does this even matter?

[SuperFinGuy]

Absolutely outstanding. NASA's research on the moon has never been verified or peer-reviewed for that matter, you just showed how questionable it was. We need to send a camera to the moon. It wouldn't be difficult with the off-the-shelf technology of today.

[syk4ryo]

Made in NASA.

[pater429]

@emiloyero it was to mutch information to work out, becouse it seems so credible.

speak english damnit, get it? might be to simpel for you to understand.

[pater429]

@emiloyero it was a joke nibwit

[emiloyero]

@pater429 hey, since when youtube has nationality? this is an open place to speak in the language people chose.

[Andrew259615]

IT'S A CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!