Van Rossem vs Larry Pratt
Top Comments
All Comments (50)
-
waar ik denk dat van rossem gelijk heeft heeft pratt zich uitstekend verweerd tegen zo'n imponerende gesprekspartner als van Rossem. Vrij aanvallend waar van Rossem juist zelf gewend is iedereen aan te vallen.
-
Ik moet zeggen dat ik wel sympathie heb voor Pratt.Op dit moment is het inderdaad niet nodig om wapens in bezit te hebben, en we zijn er op dit moment veel beter aan toe dan de praktijken die we in de VS zien. Toch zullen tijden veranderen, en dan zullen we wederom machteloos zijn. Ik geef v Rossum overigens wel helemaal gelijk dat we met een bewapende bevolking niks konden inbrengen tegen de Wehrmacht, het leger dat tegen zo'n overtuigende coalitie van naties stand hield.Belachelijke gedachte
-
Van Gogh would have never survived even if he was carrying an AA12. He got shot from behind while he was paying attention to the road he was riding his bike to work on. Even his incredible fat layers couldn't slow down the bullets enough.
Also, the Germans attacked Holland with a blitzkrieg of trained soldiers with automatic weapons, sniper rifles, tanks, and air attacks on Rotterdam. You don't thwart that by giving a bunch of farmers hunting rifles and letting them sort it out from there.
-
Van Gogh would have never survived even if he was carrying an AA12. He got shot from behind while he was paying attention to the road he was riding his bike to work on. Even his incredible fat layers couldn't slow down the bullets enough.
Also, the Germans attacked Holland with a blitzkrieg of trained soldiers with automatic weapons, sniper rifles, tanks, and air attacks on Rotterdam. You don't thwart that by giving a bunch of farmers hunting rifles and letting them sort it out from there.
-
US government is already trying to take away are guns man, look up project Fast and furious.
-
i laugh about those christian ignorant fucking americans, there is a reason why the whole world hates you assholes
-
Pratt gives examples of people protecting themselves against other governments. Yet for the USA it's almost impossible to be attacked by another government; their government will protect them from invasion. And what good does having guns do when most of the people who have guns use them against other civilians (rioters; criminals)... Does that improve security?
If a government really wants to attack its citizens with the army, the citizens will loose; especially in the case of the US army..
-
Our last king died in 1890. Learn your history Mr Pratt. And more importantly, learn to think more realistically.
-
You keep youre firearms and your school shoot outs we keep our soft drugs and whores...thank you very much bye bye dag dag
You're quite ignorant.. I'm also Dutch and Maarten van Rossem is definitely not a "media attention craving whore". He gets asked by shows because of his expertise, but most of all because of his pessimistic attitude (which is something many people like, or think it's a sign of intilligence). And about his expertise, the guy is a freaking professor and he graduated history at a university.
rensjex 2 years ago 23
Jemig, die Pratt heeft echt geen verstand van geschiedenis, alsof wij een koning hadden en als we die al hadden had die al niks over overgave te zeggen. Net doen alsof die blaffertjes V1's, V2's, tanks en vliegtuigbommen hadden tegengehouden. Ja dan hadden we natuurlijk na Rotterdam gezegd dat we pistolen hadden tegen die Duitsers en dat we echt hadden kunnen voorkomen dat Amsterdam en wie weet nog wel andere plaatsen gebombardeerd zouden worden.
Kortom: lulkoek met een stropdas.
vincevampje 2 years ago 15