RACHEL MADDOW YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF FOX NEWS CREDIBILITY PROBLEM

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,744
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 29, 2009

Do you know why Fox news has high ratings ? Well, it's what I like to call the National Enquirer Effect .Fox "news", like the National Enquirer reports on stories that are heavy on shock and light on credibility . Is Fox "news" biased and a cheer leading team for the right ? Please, need you ask ? Just look at their channel for an hour .That will answer your question . All news shows are biased in some form or another .However, that's not the issue . The issue is how biased are they on a scale from one to ten ? In my view Fox "news" would be a nine .If Shepard Smith left Fox, it would be a nine point nine .Also, the only reason liberals watch it, is because it's like watching an accident .Anyways Maddow sheds light on yet another conflict of interest and credibility issue with Fox and it's reporter John Stossel .

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (thevirtueallliberal)

  • I imagine now that some progress has been made regarding health care reform the republicans and fixed news will be getting downright ridiculous send in the clowns.. I have my popcorn ready.

  • Lol, "send in the clowns" .Yeah SmartAssWhip fox is one big circus tent,ha...What do you think of the public option unveiled today by Pelosi ?

Top Comments

  • Like when she said "gun toting whites are showing up at Tea Party protests b/c they simply can't adjust to the notion of a black president" and then it turns out the footage MSNBC had been running all day was of a BLACK man with a gun who was protesting? It was edited to not show his face or skin, but where you could only see the gun. You buy this MSNBC shit too? LMAO!

see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @celmser Why? Because she has a doctorate in PHILOSOPHY?  Do you think she considers herself a "Dr." when she nothing more than an expert in fortune cookie thinking?

  • @cano21 Don't forget when Rachel had Lauren Valle from Moveon.org who was involved in that "head stomping" incident when she rushed Pauls motorcade. She allowed Valle to use her program to tell her fabricated version of the story omitting the part where she shoved a sign in Pauls face. Maddow saw the same video that the rest of us did 24 hours later proving Valle to be a liar. No correction retraction or mention of Valles lie or Maddows role in reporting the lie.

  • @Smartassawhip "Send in the clowns." Do you guys ever pat yourselves on the back for an original comment or something not already cracked by Jon Stewart? This is just embarassing. I wonder if you can read any archives of Huffington Post or Media Matters after Rachels laughable segment on the "reptilian brian." People were using that in their vocab like it had always been there. You still hear libs echoing blurbs of "false equivilencies" after Stewarts rally. Evolve already.

  • Of course Stossel is not a news reporter. No one at Fox should be called a reporter. They should be called Infomercialists for Americans for Prosperity, Inc. There is NO news at Fox News.

  • Stossel is NOT a news reporter, you bone head!

  • I just find it funny that this little boy maddow, and countdown with jimmy legs talk about how they are such a news broadcast, but all they do is talk about FOX, if fox isn't news, why worry about them then, why not report news? Its funny too bc the only thing they show clips from are Hannity and Beck, two ppl that are OPINION shows and openly biased, not real news on the network. I mean you can just as easily find videos of Olby lying on here, but i guess those things are made up.

  • @youngwolverine2 she is smarter than the republican party put together.

  • Holy Crap!? Is that John Stewart. I thought I was seeing his double, or is John working two shifts?

  • Yet another post with no facts. I'm getting bored with you.

  • What the hell? I mean come one now. You WATCH Fox-News all the time. And so does "Rachel" By the way. So you already know what's going on with em. So why the hell should i bother sending you links about it if you already know everything? -_-

    Without mentioning, that your videos "Black up claims supposedly" are filled with criticisms and not "Facts" nor concrete evidence.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more