Lol, i actualy use this in a program that was intended to be small but then grew and grew and is now simulating hundreds of persons, over hundreds of generations..... sorting winners this way by score is varry stupid.. i need to change that. thanks for unintentionaly, by both of us, reminding me :)
noo I am not a programist and I never will be :) But thanks for the suggestion. I wouldn't be able to write an algorithm of dog peeing :D But it's cool to understand the sorting thing, kinda
Depends a lot on your data set. Insertion sort is quite good with partially sorted data and relatively small lists. It does have quadratic complexity though...
Looks like bubble sort but backward :s
vava54own 4 weeks ago
Lol, i actualy use this in a program that was intended to be small but then grew and grew and is now simulating hundreds of persons, over hundreds of generations..... sorting winners this way by score is varry stupid.. i need to change that. thanks for unintentionaly, by both of us, reminding me :)
N3CR1S 1 year ago
noo I am not a programist and I never will be :) But thanks for the suggestion. I wouldn't be able to write an algorithm of dog peeing :D But it's cool to understand the sorting thing, kinda
r0galik 1 year ago
@r0galik look for bucket sorting, i think it's the best
cesarecf 1 year ago
Depends a lot on your data set. Insertion sort is quite good with partially sorted data and relatively small lists. It does have quadratic complexity though...
blodmangel 2 years ago
Yes it is, actually its one of the worst.
TheHardwareGeek 2 years ago
that's an inefficient sort i presume?
r0galik 2 years ago