Judith Butler: Part 4/6

Playlist: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7431C65C01DDAB10

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Judith
• Butler
• Gender
• Trouble
• Queer
• Theory

[nunobranco22]

i disagree. its a completely valid question. she asks why is marriage allowed between two people only. pure convention. plus ure assuming marriage and love are the same thing which is a huge jump.furthermore i think u can fall inlove with more than one person. the idea of romantic 1-1 love is socially constructed too. u can fall inlove with and object or an animal. or god forbid a child. what are we allowed to love?

[BenNCM]

@scotty123123  what total utter bull shit you talk. As if you know Judith Butler better than you she knows herself!!!

I mean, who the fuck are you exactly? I agree. No one.

[cate7791]

Rats. I think I might follow the French and the German better if the audio and video was synchronized.

[IZn0g0uDatAll]

@michelangeli23 Ha.

[dryan22]

@utterlydazzling Why would YOU thinking she looks masculine need to correlate with HER conforming to masculinity?

[dryan22]

I don't think it's more radical to think of more than two people in a marriage, but I'd be willing to bet if it had a chance to be acceptable for a while, we'd only discover it's not worth the trouble. You make all these long-term contracts, only to find people change over time invalidating them. What do you need the contract for? Other than to say the two of you have joined your finances for a while.

[utterlydazzling]

she looks like a guy could she be conforming to a masculine role i dont know ???

[JBtlw95]

Wow..she's going far with the three marriage thing, but that's what's so great about her. I think what's really interesting about Judith Butler is she asks questions that aren't even questions because they are so much considered basements in our society. And I think that's really great because sometimes those basements don't correspond with the evolution of human understanding and the discovers we make over ourselves. Laws have to change with those evolutions

[nogocologne]

"Meisterdenkerin" der Gender-Theorie ist d. jüd. US Philosophin J.Butler.Wie viele aus diesem Theoriemilieu homosexuell&kinderlos, vertritt sie die Ansicht die Geschlechterdifferenz sei „keine Tatsache“.Dieser radikale Subjektivismus kennt nur mehr noch die sexuelle Selbstverwirklichung.Tatsächli­ch ist die Gender-Ideologie eine Form des Heile-Welt-Kitsches mit dem Wunsch nach individ. Rundumbefriedigung, vergleichbar der klassenlosen Gesellschaft der Internationalsozialisten

[Navidnak]

I disagree, and I think you miss out on her work if you focus on a single "difference" and on inclusion. Is it her "unusual mannerisms", "sexual identity", Jewishness, trouble with discipline as a child, (ad infinitum) that is the original source of "deviance"? Judith doesn't ask the questions she asks in order to knock on society's door, saying "hey, let me in", but to pound on its door and say, why is your house even built this way? and to question the logic by which it lets people in.

[newfan7]

@TricycleTim:

Well dream on good man but the way you argue shows me that you not learned the way of critical thinking especially in your own field. I would be very disappointed if you are a philosopher. So what is your profession? Linguistics, medicine, natural science?

Well I've studied some years in natural science but I was disappointed about it. I think you are right that many things are teached there in a mainly dogmatic way. - Critisism is normally blown away in this field.