Tupac: Don't Stop the Music - (Unreleased OG) -
Featuring: E.D.I. Amin, Hussein Fatal & Val Young
** DOWNLOAD LINK ** http://rapidshare.com/files/177657450/Don_t_Stop_The_Music__OG_.mp3
FUCK that hatin' ass bytch, C. Delores Tucker!!
IF y'all didn't know already...Read Up!
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 774, *
C. DELORES TUCKER and WILLIAM TUCKER, her husband, Plaintiffs, v. RICHARD FISCHBEIN, as Co-Administrator of the ESTATE OF TUPAC SHAKUR; AFENI SHAKUR, as Co-Administratrix of the ESTATE OF TUPAC SHAKUR, Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-4717
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 774
January 29, 1999, Decided
January 29, 1999, Filed
DISPOSITION: [*1] Summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Richard Fischbein and Afeni Shakur and against plaintiffs C. Delores Tucker and William Tucker.
CASE SUMMARY
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiffs, a known commentator and gangster rap critic, and her husband, filed suit against the estate of decedent musical artist who had derogatorily referred to plaintiff wife in his music lyrics. Plaintiffs' complaint alleged: intentional infliction of emotional distress; slander; invasion of privacy; and a derivative consortium claim. Defendants, co-administrators of the rap artist's estate, filed a motion for summary judgment.
OVERVIEW: Decedent musical artist had referred to plaintiff wife as a "bitch" in music lyrics. Plaintiff wife, a known commentator and critic of gangster rap music, and her husband filed suit against the estate of decedent musical artist alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress; slander; invasion of privacy; and the derivative loss of consortium claim. Defendants, co-administrator's of decedent's estate, filed a motion for summary judgment. The court evaluated the law as it pertained to libel, slander, and free speech rights. The court looked at a set of factors to determine if speech was
actionable: (a) whether the statement was maliciously written or published; and (b) whether it tended to blacken a person's reputation or to expose him to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule, or to injure him in his business or profession. Also, the court was to look at the nature of the audience hearing the remarks and the effect the communication was calculated to produce. The court also looked at precedent that opinion, conveyed in public speech, was not libelous or actionable. Finding that the plaintiffs' complaint was not actionable, the court granted defendants summary judgment.
OUTCOME: Summary judgment was entered in favor of defendants, co-administrators of the estate of a late, known musical artist and against plaintiffs, known commentator and gangster rap critic wife and her husband, because the language plaintiffs objected to was not actionable, thus their claims of: intentional infliction of emotional distress; slander; invasion of privacy; and the derivative consortium claim, failed.
CORE TERMS: bitch, wonda, nigga, lyrics, livin, game, betcha, fast, lane, muthafucka, baby, song, legs, rap, defamatory, actionable, epithet, lookin, love, libelous, profile, thang, vigorous, contempt, listened, listeners, gettin, talkin, switch, worst
COUNSEL: For C. DELORES TUCKER, WILLIAM TUCKER, PLAINTIFFS: RICHARD C. ANGINO, JAMES DE CINTI, ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C., HARRISBURG, PA USA.
For RICHARD FISCHBEIN, AFENI SHAKUR, DEFENDANTS: STEPHEN J. KASTENBERG, BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS AND INGERSOLL, PHILA, PA USA. BRUCE N. LEDERMAN, FISCHBEIN, BADILLO, WAGNER & HARDING, NEW YORK, NY USA.
JUDGES: RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, J.
OPINIONBY: RONALD L. BUCKWALTER
OPINION: MEMORANDUM
BUCKWALTER, J.
January 29, 1999
Before the court is the motion of defendants Richard Fischbein and Afeni Shakur, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Tupac Shakur, requesting the court to enter summary judgment on their behalf as to all counts set forth in plaintiffs' amended complaint.
All other defendants named in the amended complaint were dismissed by order of this court dated February 18, 1998.
The amended complaint seeks relief against the defendants for:
1. Intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count II);
2. Slander (Count III);
3. Invasion of Privacy (Count IV); and
4. Loss of consortium.
Enjoy my show & this dope track!
Please: Rate, comment & subscribe...
Thanks for watching!
@MrWicked61671 ayyye where did you get that pic that goes from 0:16 to 0:20 that says OUTLAWZ on itt... i tried a google image search but couldnt find nothin like it... if its from an album or somethin tell me, cuz i want that picturee... anybody who can help, help me out... Thanks
juanisabastard 9 months ago
@juanisabastard - I found it on Google ''Images.'' Try searching the Death Row logo once. I can't remember what I searched to find it. Sorry.
MrWicked61671 9 months ago
Delores Fuckher
disciple21781 1 year ago 8
@disciple21781 - LMAO! Fuck that hatin' ass bitch.
MrWicked61671 1 year ago 2
wtfff this songg is fuckiinnnn legendaryyyyy.... delores tucker, marin luther king is rolling in his gravebvecause you criticized 2pac!!!
lakersownsuns 1 year ago 6
I know that's right. LMAO!
MrWicked61671 1 year ago