Cancer Research uk

advert

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• cancer
• research1

[davidtennantisno1]

i have done the race for life 3 times with my mummy

[roostar0889]

i certainly don't agree with calling someone a spaz because they expressed their views on animal rights, they are entitled to their opinion...but my opinion is that cancer research are doing an amzing job at helping loads of people so maybe the animal 'sacrifice' is worth it...?

[rsuesakul]

randy suesakul

[smellygrungerme]

cancer is cancer, whether in humans or animals

[0madmadame]

we ARE animals you idiot. and it does not benifit our race to be ruthless. and my point was that by giving money to cancer research you are paying for animal cruelty which is not even getting us any closer to curing cancerit just goes into the CEOs pockets. and if you really believe that there will never be a cure for cancer why support cancer research at all?

[halfawake454]

There will probably never will be a true "cure" for cancer. Anyway, my point was that animal testing does bring about good things for humans. If you decided to use half of your brain you would have understood that quite clearly.

It just blows my mind how people can give a shit about an animal over a human being. What a sad fuckin race we are. It my mind humans will always have priorities over animals. It amazed me that anyone else can feel any different.

[NERDKING1000]

actually according to the results of animal testing painkillers are a lethal substance. it killed every animal that it was tested on. animal testing is entirely inaccurate in comparison to humans. if it was accurate why do we need clinical trials on humans? plus cancer research did not develop anything you listed there buddy. cancer research hasn't done what it said it would after all these years and billions in funding still no cure for cancer.

[halfawake454]

Even if it is true, better Monkey's Rabbits, Mice, Rats, and Pigs than a human being.

FYI, here is a short list of vaccines, cures, and procedures developed in the 20th century from animal testing: Vaccines: Anthrax, Chicken Pox, Cholera, Diphtheria, Flu, Influenza B, Hepatitis A and B, measles, mumps, polio, rabies, rubella, smallpox, tetanus, whooping cough, yellow fever. Medications: Insulin, Penicillin, streptomycin, anti-inflammatory drugs, pain killers....If you want I could continue.

[0madmadame]

even if that was true, Monkeys, Rabbits, Mice, Rats, and Pigs all feel pain just as much as cats and dogs so what is you point? Most of the money paid to Cancer research goes to the Managers and CEOs rather than on actual research so it's just a con anyway. Animal testing is NOT nessesary and is barbarick and cowardly. it is not acceptible to take advantage of those who are vulnerable. CR doesn't save more lives than it takes.

[08drifter]

Cancer Research UK does not test on dogs or cats.

Macmillan doesn't test on anything. They're not a research-based organisation, they offer care and support for patients and their families, amongst other things.

Cancer Research UK has had amazing breakthroughs in the last few years, and thanks to their research more people now survive cancer.

So try NOT talking about things you don't have a clue about.

[0madmadame]

wow I wonder how many dogs, cats and other helpless animals your donation paid to kill horribly. cancer research tests on animals even though it is not nessesary due to technological advances and computer simulations. if we relied on animal tresting we'd think painkillers were deadly toxins. animal testing NEVER GIVES ACCURATE RESULTS FOR ILLNESSES IN HUMANS the scientists do it because it pays well and tell people it is nessesary to keep thier jobs. macmillan doesn't test on animals.