Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 In Plane Site [4-8] Director's Cut [Dave VonKleist]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,198
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 19, 2009

Full film - http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=2361717427531377078
[Alternate] http://www.megavideo.com/?v=T09YQ08G
[Alternate] http://blip.tv/file/2028580
[Alternate] http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/activism_non_profit/watch/v1828934...

http://Drey.orgfree.com
CHECK OUT THE OCULAR STREAM!

Health & Politics Section
http://Drey.orgfree.com/Politricks.html

Hundreds of Films, TV Shows, Documentaries, Comedy, everything full-length, linked material sourced by me from all across the internet.
_____

Why were America and the world never shown the video and photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16 ft. hole?

Many people do not realize that the outer wall did not collapse until almost 30 minutes after the initial impact.

See these astonishing photographs and video footage for the first time.

Given that the outer wall of the Pentagon had not yet collapsed and the only hole is approximately 16 ft. in diameter - how does a jetliner over 44 feet tall and 125 ft. wide fit into that hole as shown in the crystal-clear and close-up photographic evidence from the Pentagon?

Furthermore, can physics explain why there is no damage to the Pentagon's upper floors where the tail section would have hit? ?

"I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast... it sounded nothing like an airplane." Lon Rains - editor for Space News (Pentagon eyewitness)

In the aftermath, it was reported by media sources that a giant 100 ft. crater was plowed into the front lawn of the Pentagon as the result of a powerful airliner crash.

Why does photographic evidence overwhelmingly show that this was absolutely not the case?

Why no crater?
Why no skid marks?
Why no burn marks?
Why was the entire world deliberately mislead?

Examine the video and photographic evidence for yourself.

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They couldn't have been collapsed by demolition devices. If it were, the bottom of the tower would have been blown to take the impact, and create less of a mess like 7. But 7 could have been rigged in 8 hrs. They have experts who can demo a building in an emergency to control the situation on a moments notice. The pentagon in the beginning videos were interesting though.

  • Inside job. KILLUMINATI!

  • wow every page the same people arguing! lol pretty funny actually. Not the video - the bickering (great documentary though!)

  • @scottieman2 u are a fool i ask for proof and you give me wikipidea! then jump off the subject onto another one! are u working for the government in any kind of way? if not u should u seem a perfect candidate

  • @TheUtubeNaziMovement You know, get over yourself and go back to beating up people that are different then you, fag. I'm don't defending myself against people like you.

  • @scottieman2 well its a shame retards like you are out there brainwashed wankers get back to cnn

  • @TheUtubeNaziMovement Thanks for calling me an idiot. I'm so glad assholes like you are still out there.

  • @scottieman2 lmao who owns wikipidea? IDIOT

  • @TheUtubeNaziMovement go on Wikipedia and they say its all disproved and all that shit.

  • @scottieman2 show me proof of this being wrong!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more