Is this proof that Bigfoot is real ?

Bill Munns, a professional researcher, comes to the conclusion after a deep examination that Bigfoot is not a fake.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Bigfoot
• Munns
• professional
• researcher
• creature
• analyst
• examination

[emancoy]

if the patterson film was a fraud, then its the best fraud ever made because even the experts couldn't agree.

[reclaimerReclaimer]

Nope. Quite clearly eminbozo has some kind of grudge against Munns, I'm guessing mostly likely jealous f/x rivalry or something. In fact, Munns' 100% spot on with most analysis, and the proven fact that it's no hoax it evidently the biggest threat to some jokers. Patty's a bit over 7ft, too tall (long torso) and too broad to have a guy inside operating head, arms, etc. No one could reach up or across, the shoulders are set too far apart and arms swinging naturally. So no pads possible. Anywhere.

[seymourbbest]

Munns has an opinion. But ZERO scientific to back up his claims. Examining a bit of film is NOT a valid method for claiming a new species exists. That's silly.

[liondoghound]

I don't want to see anyone get hurt finding this location. The film is fake. 

[eminboztepe]

Bill Munns did facial makeup. Big deal. He has no experience whatsoever with suits made by Prohaksa, Chambers, etc.

The suit he made in Swamp Thing is the reason why no one in Hollywood considers him to be a costume professional.

[DumDDumDum]

Bill is using a formula which doesn't take into consideration the rotational effects which requires 5 known dimensions instead of 3. Therefor he is only using horizontal and vertical displacements which is okay for filming but not for analysis.