Lincoln Mark VII LSC punched

Trying to top it out... damn Honda Accords...

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• lincoln
• mark
• iii
• iv
• v
• vi
• vii
• viii
• 5.0
• ho
• mustang
• cadillac
• 302

[svtlincoln]

BULLSHIT. the Mark VII's are not faster then the Mark VIII's. Mark VII's weight just as much and made 55 less horsepower then the Mark VIII. The 1992 LSC mark VII's ran low 16's and the occasional high 15. The Mark VIII's all run low 15's/ high 14's. SO how are the mark VII's faster????

[granadojl]

What year is your friends 5.0??? they changed the output mid way through production... Plus, I doubt your friend's 4.0 can keep up with my 5.0 based block

[Penisbaby101]

There is a reason why the Mark VIII was the last in its line. It was an ugly failure and it deterred a lot of Lincolns 2 door audience because it was to sporty and not enough Lincoln. It also didnt win over much of a sportier audience either. Lincoln either had to try and bring back the 2 door Lincoln audience or take an even greater risk of going further into the luxury sport theme. Neither was worth the risk and instead came the underdeveloped Lincoln LS, a 4 door sporty Lincoln with issues.

[H20MarkVIII]

@RetroGamingGuide I got a 7 for my first car and about 2 years ago I got an 8, before I got my 8 I was saying the same thing you are with hating the 8s look... however after a week of having it I absolutely loved how it looks, it really does grow on you plus it turns 10x more heads than my 7 does, the 7 has lost its style to me now. I still love my 7 but the 8 is at least twice as nice basically in every way. I still split my driving between the two cars, but I honestly like the 8 more.

[coltonwithano]

these are cool but my tbird would kill it

[westworth327]

...I own an LSC and yours looks rather slow, like mine before I fixed some issues, bro. Not dissin you for fun or fame, I'm lookin like, man...But Honda still cant beat that!! haha I smoked MANY "imports" with my LSC as a junker, lol

[markVIIchick]

@svtlincoln

I fully agree! I own both. Don't get me wrong I love my Mark VII but damn the Mark VIII is on another level.

Just point the nose and it will haul ass (even when I don't want it to).

[bergaflickal]

wich is easier 2 mod the 5.0 or the 4.6 i wanna switch from a 96 impala ss 2 another sleeper that ppl wont take seriously and how do the engines and trans hold up

[humanparody12]

I think your steering wheel's missing some parts. :P

[svtlincoln]

@MegaFordpower yes and you also claim a LSC has a diff cam, intake and blah blah blah and that's in 2sec faster. blah blah blah. do a lil research and quit makin shit up. 95 base Mark VIII made 280hp, the LSC made 290hp. that's it. end of story. STFU. and leave me the hell alone.

[MegaFordpower]

@svtlincoln actually their was a base mark and that is the one that started 93-98 and i know that lsc came in 95 damn ass that what said last time i sent you . don't you know how to read bitch.

[svtlincoln]

@MegaFordpower the mark vii is NOT faster than a "base" 93-94 Mark VIII. Actually there was no "base" 93-94 Mark VIII, since the LSC wasn't an option until late in the 95 production year. A 1993 Mark VIII is a low 15sec car all day long. Once again, how is a low 15sec 1/4 mile slower than a high 15sec 1/4 mile? The LSC had the same damn engine as all the other Mark VIII's the only diff was a true dual exhaust worth a whopping 10hp, and 3.27 rear gear and they were only a tenth of sec faster.