Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

David Gregory Questions Tony Snow

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
47,529
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 16, 2007

January 16, 2007

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 25 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (183)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What do you base this on? The idiocy of your entire comment is mind blowing. He was on Fox so he's literally stupid? You're obviously liberal, fine... do you need to be so redicuously hateful that you've lost all your common sense though?

  • The media is on no one's side except for their stock holders and corporate partners. Never forget that. It's because of bloggers they are forced to interject reality into their reporting.

  • The question I asked above was, "What is the source of your information that we provided weapons to IRAQ (not Iran) AFTER Saddam gassed the Kurds?" Also, although I agree that the Associated Press story that you are quoting is troubling, it does not state what you imply it does - that the US is KNOWINGLY selling weapons (or weapons parts) to the Iranians. It simply states that, due to poor inventory and sales controls, an Iranian middleman was able to buy surplus F-14 parts.

  • Well how about the recent report from the GOA reveling we're STILL selling Iran military harware. Parts to their F14's we sold them before the Islamic revolution.  As recent as 2005.

    "The GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, found it alarmingly easy to acquire sensitive surplus. Last year, its agents bought $1.1 million worth — including rocket launchers, body armor and surveillance antennas — by driving onto a base and posing as defense contractors."

  • Joe Scarborough, he's got an hour long show right after him. Pat Buchanan is a regular contributor.

    Fox shows one side.

  • FOX = republican military industrical propaganda. Although all the other stations in our republic of Oceania are not much better.

  • Fox shows all sides of an issue. CNN and MSNBC do not. For example, who is MSNBC's 'conservative Keither Olberman'?

  • If CNN and MSNBC are perceived as "too liberal" how is Fox News considered fair and balanced on it's own merits?

  • I am interested in the truth, which generally does support my world view.

  • So does it mean that you don't mind biased journalism as long as it supports your world view?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more