cdk007 fail

"claiming that a similar "miracle" happened repeatedly requires either incredible blind faith or a cause common to each event, such as a common designer"
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences21.html

"The many similarities that exist among members of the animal kingdom is the result of the fact that a single designer created the basic kinds of living 'systems'"
http://creation.com/does-homology-provide-evidence-of-evolutionary-naturalism

"This "common material" is not the result of an evolution but of "common design", that is, their being created upon the same plan."
http://www.harunyahya.com/articles/70common_sci03.php

"Common features can just as logically demonstrate a common Designer."
http://www.evolutionoftruth.com/evo/evotxtbk.htm

Category:

Education

Tags:

• common
• intellignet
• design
• designer
• cdk007
• fail
• evolution
• atheism
• theism
• creationism

[Drgamedood]

Hmmm, a video that demonstrates your ignorance on Evolution, blocking people who disagree with you, and with links to creationist websites in the description box? You're on your way to becoming a typical creationist youtuber. Keep at it! ;-)

[Mozza314]

@Drgamedood Don't jump to conclusions about people who disagree with you. I am certainly not a creationist. Have look over my subscriptions, watch some of my older videos. Let me know if you look into this and still don't believe me.

[Drgamedood]

@Mozza314 So is this video a parody of creationists? The creationist links in the description bar and trying (unsuccessfully) to rebut cdk007's "common design common designer" video tend to make one think you are a creationist.

[Mozza314]

@Drgamedood No, it's not a parody. I give the creationist links not to support them or indicate that I agree with them, but to demonstrate that their view is different from cdk007's interpretation of "common design, common designer". My whole point is not that creationism deserves any merit but that cdk007's particular point is invalid. 3:48 note how I opine that the second part of cdk007's video about genetic variation revealing hierarchical structures IS a good argument against creationism.

[henchmen999]

do these creationist boneheads ever realize that they have the highest number of thumbs down on thier videos? I will say this though, i respect the bravery of any creationist that puts up a video this dumb and still allows comments, good for you, mozza314! also, dont worry, puberty will kick in soon and you will stop looking like a trannie.

[Mozza314]

@henchmen999 Troll. Blocked.

[PachucoDesigns]

@Mozza314 Then what the hell are you arguing against? "Common design, common designer" is broken logic. It is a false dichotomy. And in the case of life, it begs the question. He demonstrated that. That was the point of examining it from the other side, to show that "different design, different designer" is broken logic for the exact same reasons. I'm not trolling, you're simply incorrect. I don't care if common design can mean common designer. It doesn't have to, and therefor is a moot point.

[PachucoDesigns]

@Mozza314 What I state isn't opinion, it's a fact. And I repeat it over and over because you don't seem to get it. And by the 89 dislikes in comparison to the 14 likes you have here, apparently multiple people agree with me. I've pinned down exactly what it's about. Apparently you haven't.

[urantivirus]

@Mozza314 "Just knee jerk reactions I think, many claiming I'm a creationist. Apparently cdk007's audience doesn't respond well to his criticism."

Keep telling yourself that.

[Mozza314]

@ParaSpite Totally.