Chomsky: In swing states vote Obama without illusions

Anarchist = socialist libertarian.  There's nothing to reconcile.

actually there is. first of all there are more than one types of anarchist. second, a public health care system requires that there be a "public", ie. a state, as opposed to "private", ie. owned by a person or group of people. in an anarchist system the police, firemen, road constructors, etc. are all privatized because there's no state to make it "public" or "nationalized".
how would health care be different from what the US has now?

Nothing to reconcile? Oh, ok. "Smash the state...and while you're at it implement forced government health care."

Hypocrite.

The idea isn't to get rid of all forms of order and public benefits, but to dismantle the centralized power of the federal government and enormous corporations. Health care could be handled much more efficiently if managed regionally. You don't need the centralized power of a federal government to achieve that. There's nothing contradictory about this. The economic system he proposes is Parecon, specifically, if you're interested.

Um, he's an "anarchist" and he's recommending the expansion of the state? He thinks it's ok for Nancy Pelosi to control my medical decisions?

I don't want her tyranny and I don't want his or yours. I don't want my health care "managed regionally". I'm quite capable of making my own arrangements with others as long as we are not repressed by Pelosi, Chomsky, or anyone else.

I honestly cannot tell the difference between statists and collectivist "anarchist." Is it just a change of rulers?