Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Chomsky: In swing states vote Obama without illusions

Noam Chomsky: People should vote against McCain and for Obama - but without illusions  
 
Customize

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
676 ratings
Sign in to rate
92,702 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (4)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (698)   Options

Loading...
alistairproductions (8 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@alistairproductions a piece of paper or trophy*
alistairproductions (8 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@pollywogA1 Hahaha listen man, there's more to credibility than certificates and trophies. This man has written like 1000s of essays on politics... Do you seriously think you need a PhD in something to speak about it? I mean this man probably has some knowledge of almost ever historical event that is considered significant and you want to see a piece of trophy. Absolutely incredible.
pollywogA1 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
Dr. Noam Chomsky, PhD in Anthropology and specialized in Linguistics - not politics or economics. He should stick to swinging the alphabet instead of continuing to make a fool of himself.
sjnsingh1 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Chomsky has the most intelligent political insights of any USAn. I think you should stop making a fool of yourself.
xiuka666 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Obama genocida
MillionthUsername (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
dzan242 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Anarchist = socialist libertarian. There's nothing to reconcile.
loturos (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
actually there is. first of all there are more than one types of anarchist. second, a public health care system requires that there be a "public", ie. a state, as opposed to "private", ie. owned by a person or group of people. in an anarchist system the police, firemen, road constructors, etc. are all privatized because there's no state to make it "public" or "nationalized".
how would health care be different from what the US has now?
MillionthUsername (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Nothing to reconcile? Oh, ok. "Smash the state...and while you're at it implement forced government health care."

Hypocrite.
dzan242 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
The idea isn't to get rid of all forms of order and public benefits, but to dismantle the centralized power of the federal government and enormous corporations. Health care could be handled much more efficiently if managed regionally. You don't need the centralized power of a federal government to achieve that. There's nothing contradictory about this. The economic system he proposes is Parecon, specifically, if you're interested.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.