Brave New World - Film, Lit and the NWO

http://www.corbettreport.com

In this installment of "Film, Literature and the New World Order," The Corbett Report explores Aldous Huxley's classic work of science-fiction, Brave New World. Brave New World is a dystopic vision of a nightmare future in which worker drones are engineered from birth to perform slave labour for a world dictatorship. Even more frighteningly, the workers have even been engineered to love their servitude. Most frightening of all, Huxley's own family background and experience might show that Brave New World is not so completely fictional as we would like to believe...

For more information on this video series, please listen to Episode 088 of The Corbett Report podcast "You Are Being Programmed"

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• huxley
• brave
• new
• world
• order
• nwo
• science
• fiction
• analysis
• criticism
• dictatorship
• slavery
• scientific
• darwin
• galton

[BetterGetReadyToDie]

nazi stands for national socialist and the socialists-communists in china have a eugenics practice that makes the 1940s german's look slow

[TWISTbeats]

great video.

[Avalon400]

The first thing we have to get rid of is the "Ghetto Mentality", next; the tendencey to flock to religious cults like Fundi-Christianity and Islam. The future looks bright indeed !

[dharmashooter]

I find it astounding that people will accuse Aldous Huxley of supporting the ideas in Brave New World simply because of family associations. It seems quite clear that he never did. It's astounding too because conspiracy theorists making him guilty by genetic association actually support the idea of eugenics and refute individualism in the process. Aldous was an iconoclast and a great man who warned the world about the dangers of technology.

[izelatlan0478]

The questions are interesting. It is also an interesting giggle "dynamic tension" between how our world is and what we would put up with if we could truly have a society free of hunger, hate and war. The problem I suspect that restriction would not improve that. Soviet Russia was more controlled than the West but no less violent. Maybe a tad less hnger but not really good food. So restriction would most likely be just restriction and not much more..

[Decide85]

@BetterGetReadyToDie

Eugenics in china? Can you proof your claim?

[sunset002007]

@urantiruslan lol...yes, the long dream come true for all the assh* stricto sensu utopian & absolutists leftists (&masons behind that ideology from the beginning btw; a dream about that kind of 'liberated' future for humanity..with 'them' as the controlers obviously -&the other members of the cult..or party - at the top of the pyramid, definitively controlling all the others; here, literally, from craddle to grave; total & absolute control on drugged individuals..a dystopia for everyone else ^

[urantiruslan]

thats what i'm thinking of

that is a utopia

[Wittgensteinism]

@FatJesusSD How about it?

You just described a Utopia.

A future without hate? Sounds great!

History? Let's put it behind us shall we..

Without religion? Sounds utopian enough ;)

Without Heros? Well i guess a world without villians WOULD mean no heros, so are you actually advocating the need for villiany in society? lol!

Individuality? That may be overrated, and in another sense, a Brave New World utopia is extremely individualistic, but either way, it's not worth preventing utopia is it?

[Wittgensteinism]

It's not a nightmare future, it's a Utopian future, without pain, disease, or suffering; of continual pleasure and promiscuous indulgences. What may appear "scary" about it is that we're viewing it from the lens of the present. We must remind ourselves that people looking at our modern society from 100 years ago, would equally be terrified of what our society looks like.

We're just bias because humans are naturally conservative and afraid to make real fundamental changes to our lives.

[yrsnkd]

The part about them being obsessed with inbreeding rings hollow... Charles Darwin, from what I've read, was perpetually terrified that his marriage to his cousin would have caused an imbalance in their children, so if he really had that much sway over the "Bulldog"'s family, they would have surely known that.