Dale Myers - Voodoo Geometry

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,954
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 17, 2008

This is the video that Dale Myers tried to ban by telling Youtube it was a copyright violation.

But Myers permits fellow conspiracy deniers to post his entire presentation on Youtube, while Harris only used a small segment in his.

It is obvious that Myers didn't care about copyright infringement. What he cared about was being criticized and being caught red-handed, misrepresenting the positions of President Kennedy and Governor Connally during the assassination, for the purpose of making it appear that the shot came from the alleged sniper's nest in the Texas Schoolbook Depository.

In short, Mr. Myers was every bit as dishonest with Youtube as he has been with his viewers.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (198)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Myers also mentions the jacket of Gov Connally bulges at the moment Kennedy is hiit, reinforcing the SBT. Thoughts?

  • The bottom line that Myers leaves out is the fact that more than three shots were fired. He tries to convince us through computer animation like NIST shows us the WTC pancake theory. Proof through computer animation is a tactic the conspirators use frequently. THE bin Laden compound raid is the latest.

  • Thank you Bob! I was just looking for something like that since the DM explanation didn´t seem correct to me. I´m still wondering what happened with the Discovery Channel :(

  • @Scottthefish That's the opinion of the experts interviewed by the HSCA in terms of the weight of the pieces. Those traces are mere flakes.

    "NAA tests can only connect fragments to a batch of bullets." That's true now, but it's not true of the bullets we are talking about made circa 1960, in particular the WCC bullets. Antimony levels were found to be significantly different bullet-to-bullet within a batch, but within a narrow range within a bullet.

  • @1239jer I cannot go weigh these, but the pieces photographed in the petri dishes look a LOT bigger than .03 grains. There are radio-logic traces in both men still. NAA tests can only connect fragments to a batch of bullets, not a specific bullet. This trajectory still does not explain the bullet hole in the mid-line of JFK's neck, just below the adams apple.

  • ...the sign is visible in numerous other films/photos AND is in the same position when the WC reconstructed the scene, we KNOW that the positioning of the limo was not moved. His inane observations of figures moving legs too fast for 1/18th of a frame ignores is easily explained - motion blur makes the figures indistinct for some frames!

    Further, and this has been confirmed by numerous reconstructions, the Zapruder film MATCHES the other films and photos taken that day. This guy has NO CLUE.

  • The Zapruder "anomolies." I watched the video in question and its level of "analysis" is laughable. Numerous howlers there, like suggesting that the position of the motorcade was altered by compositing. He bases this on stuff like figures seen not facing the motorcade. But he leaves out a rather massive problem - the perspective would no longer match! And, since we see light poles which we know were there AND the sign which he bizarrely claims wasn't...

  • @funkmasterjee Sturdivan responded to the Randich/Grant study by saying they ignored what bullets we'd expect from the early 1960s, basing their conclusions in part on the modern reality which discounts NAA.

    It should be noted that the NAA analysis is CONSISTENT with the SBT, the best counter-argument is suggesting (as R&G did) that it is POSSIBLE other bullets are represented, though Sturdivan says this is wildly IMPROBABLE.

  • @funkmasterjee Dr Vincent Guinn testified to the HSCA that THOSE bullets - the WCC batch WERE distinguishable owing to the non-uniformity of the antimony used in their manufacture. He - and others - found ranges of antimony within a single bullet which differed from other bullets in the same batch and were characteristic.

    He and Rahn, Sturdivan later deemed it highly unlikely that a 3rd bullet (or 4th) would coincidentally match in terms of antimony levels.

  • @funkmasterjee The "fatal flaw" is the presumed heterogeniety of individual bullets, an analysis which in fact negates the utility of the NAA now - why? Because manufacturing methods mean modern bullets are indistinguishable from one another in a batch owing to the uniformity of their creation.

    But we are talking about what we'd expect - and what the heterogeniety was - of bullets made 50 years ago.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more