Kagan Won't Rubber Stamp Declaration of Independence
Top Comments
All Comments (39)
-
Hmmm...does she not understand why those words were put there in the first place? The Bill of Rights and Constitution were put in place to protect the people from sliding back into subjugation (slavery). Who the hell gives her the right to take that away? Does she have the authority of God and we just don't realize it? This is not a Rebup or Dem issue. This goes to the very core of our American Sovereignty. People like this are our number one enemy no matter if they are a D or an R!
-
she doesn't believe in INALIENABLE rights because she wants to take them away
-
Elena Kagan is facing the Castle Defense: When your life & limb is threatened, and you cannot retreat; this is the Castle Defense when you take a life, and States often only allow you in your own home (castle) for such a thing. In a higher legal standard, is there any right to defend yourself? As we see the Constitution give war powers, and the United States does face war; the question means self-preservation, and Elena Kagan cannot find any self-preservation duty for someone who holds law.
-
There are inalienable rights for ALL HUMAN BEINGS, intrinsic to them from the moment of their creation. And the actions of the governments of the world - at very least in living memory - shows that NO CAREER POLITICIAN believes that there are inalienable rights, here in America or elsewhere. Their power can ONLY increase by eroding the rights of the People, and ignoring the rule of law.
-
Not knowing anything about the two women behind Senator Coburn, I was looking at their faces. The mouth on the brunette slowly opening as nominee Kagan spoke. I hope that was duplicated throughout the room and with all who see this. Notice the glance by the blond. All this could be something not a part of her testimony but I think that it is a view into the people's minds concerning her answers and Our Constitution (Dec. of Inde. and Bill of Rights).
-
Chilling.
-
Just ANSWER the question do you believe we have INALIENABLE RIGHTS, obviously she does not.
-
@alexckfang Wrong. Inalienable rights are the basis of all claims of government behavioral legitimacy. For example, if there was no inherent right to one's own property, then government would have absolutely no claim to punish a thief.
-
She's a Tool & Useful Idiot for The Elite Progressives
@xfinitex Oh she rose to the bait alright, her evasive posturing spoke volumes where she stands and who she works for.
Ultramediacorp 1 year ago 12
Just more proof that this broad is a leftist radical Obama hack. Absolutely UNQUALIFIED to be a judge, let alone a Supreme Court Justice with a life time appointment.
LibtardsSuck 1 year ago 10