6 Year-Old Girl Evicted: WTF? HELP!
Top Comments
All Comments (24)
-
It is sad but I understand. These old people have move to a place that keeps out the young. so they no longer had to worry so much about crack whores and pinps moving in next door. That is what you risk if you let the 6 year old stay. Daughter wants to stay with her 6 year old next and then she wants her boy friend that is pinp crack dealer. Next you got friends wanting to have a party. Some one needs to help gandma sell her home and move with grand daughter. HOA are shit
-
I agree with Dave Carroll. By waiting so long to take action on the matter, this situation has become far worse than it should have been. They have put this family in jeopardy by waiting 5 YEARS to resolve the issue. Now the market has crashed and its nearly impossible for them to sell their home. And I believe the community should take responsibility for their part. The universal rule of thumb is: You snooze, you lose.
-
I just feel that after letting it go for this long, already, they have already forfeited the right to enforce it now, suddenly, and on this particular family, who is obviously caught between a rock and a hard spot, and when, in the end, the little kid pays the price for all of their indecision and inconsistency... all of them!
-
This is in part the argument I am making. If the association does not enforce the rule, then the rule becomes void.
The community could have voted to change the rule, they might have been able to vote for acception in this case, but those items never happened.
Unfortunately any judge will side with the community.
I will say our discussion has been unusally civil for these type of sites, and for that I thank you.
-
Plus, the agreement was revoked 5 years ago and with that being the case an arbitrary time limit is not only not fair, but probably negates all legality of the contract, in a court of law. But, if they could afford a good lawyer, we probably wouldn't be having this conversation. Case: "Restraining Order". When the party that obtained the order voluntarily "allows" the restrained person to be in violation of the court order, that order is null and void. At least it is in California.
-
Still no compassion and regard for the times and a situation that has catastrophic implication for the dependent "child". She is the point, not the association/members or the grandparents or the rules. She is not harming them or threatening their life style, regardless of how one may try to make it sound. Extraordinary time require extraordinary solutions, and these are extraordinary time, period. Compassion needs to be at its ultimate level in many, many situations, now!
-
No and.
I am not an evil Capitalist.
I am a hard working rather liberal person.
The community was generous in allowing 5 years for the grandparents to move out. You can't step on everyone else because you want to take in your grand daughter.
-
and....
-
Yes. I guess I'm an evil capitalist who works 45-60 hours a week for a 50,000 year salery. Trying to keep all 78 home owners in my building happy and living communally. I enforce no motor bike rules, and carry your dog through the building rules. I also help keep preditor sales people from taking advantage of senior residents, help with minor repairs at no charge, assist when an ambulance is called.
-
Ahhh... you're one of them... no need for any of us to try to talk common sense and morality... just another Capitalist... hope you don't need any compassion some day!
is the landlord/judge actually even CONSIDERING THIS?!?!?!?
@ 0:38 - I would love to sock this old hag right in the face.
What have we become... how did we get so bad that we would consider kicking a sweet 6 yr old child out of her grandparent's care to be placed in a foster home. Unbelievable. Im disugusted and these people should be ashamed of themselves.
hopelesspirate 2 years ago 3