Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Power of Paper

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,189
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 31, 2010

One of the most common ways government and corporate institutions rob, cheat and control us is with something called "default contracts". Through our "silence" they presume authority to own us, our property, our wealth and our privacy. Sadly, our courts and statutes actually support this due to some odd contents of the Uniform Commercial Code. This video demonstrates one way to remedy those unintended "obligations." Learn more about this by going to http://www.startpage.com and entering the search phrase "How to write an affidavit."

Freedom-oriented videos on YouTube tend to attract a lot of anonymous institutional and government "boiler room" impostors, disruptors and agitators. These sponsored social network terrorists use hate speech, profanity, racism, name-calling and contrived insults to destroy and marginalize intellectual discussions about freedom on social networks. Who would be opposed to individual empowerment and freedom? The institutions who take and thrive on the earnings and productivity of private individuals and taxpayers. Those institutions are also the ones with the resources to conduct those boiler room operations. For that reason comments on this video are screened. Those who would call that "censorship" are welcome to create their own YouTube pages and be as un"censored" as they wish.

This video was not produced by legal experts or professional advisers. It is layman's opinion intended only to provoke thought. Use these principals at your own risk.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (124)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @RICHARDIVANdotCOM That is your choice. Thank you for your comments.

  • @RICHARDIVANdotCOM Your sentence structure is not clear. All the warrant does is give the enforcer some encouragement by, sometimes, a corrupt court, to use force on you. You are then under threat of force and you will be harmed if you do not submit to force. This is no longer an offer. It is a threat of assault by overwhelming force.

  • @RICHARDIVANdotCOM The example was extreme, but perfectly applicable to other circumstances. If I make an offer of seafood, and you are allergic to seafood, you may refuse in honor. In fact, you don't need an allergy, or any other excuse. You just need to respectfully state your position. That is honorable refusal. Never allow yourself to be trapped by a manipulative offer.

  • @minivanjack I enjoyed the conversation with you very much. I believe we have agreed on some points in some way and that's what matters. Now, let me terminate it, would that be OK? : )

  • @minivanjack The persons do the harm to each other by being disgraceful, dishonorable... and I believe that's why we have the structure of the system we have today... I don't believe that people are harming themselves, really, brotherhoods and stuff... I think that these are for the protection from the persons...

  • @minivanjack Yes, but if you are coming to a transaction with this dangerous belief of there is evil and cruelty you might wrong those who are not and that of itself is not noble, gracious and good, which is what we kinda all are looking for in my belief, isn't it?

  • @RICHARDIVANdotCOM The do you understand thing, where some persons claim it to be "do you stand under me" is in my belief rather a thing of comprehending what he might be saying to you. He says one thing, you think another, he asks you whether you get it and you say yes. But he never defined the words he used and he might have meant something else then you think the words mean. And I think that this is what him the right to let's say arrest you or similar thing. He gets the warrant. Same refusal

  • @minivanjack This scenario is just stupid. Would I die? Fuck it, the other person would die also, if he choose to do it. But any way in a normal case:

    If somebody would threaten me with a gun I would have right to defend myself against him any way I please without being liable for my actions.

    In case of an offer, I believe there is no rational person which would offer me to give me a bullet, do you?

    What I was suggesting by saying that refusal is an offence was rather a "normal" transaction.

  • @RICHARDIVANdotCOM The evidence of evil and cruelty are easily found. Only by denial are they not seen. When you presume all others to be good you empower and enable those who are not.

  • @RICHARDIVANdotCOM

    1) Why hope? You are the master of what affects you, but you must act.

    2) It makes no sense to die over a stupid "offer". Simply refuse and move on.

    3) ??? - not clear. Don't put your life in the hands of others. Some will take advantage.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more