Science - The Bible's Best Friend (3 of 3)

The propaganda going on today atempts to pit Science VS. (against) the Bible, when in reality, Science is the Bible's best friend. I am sick and tired of Anti-Christ's constantly trying to make ridiculas claims that Science in some way dispels the Bible when in does the exact opposite and SUPPORTS the Bible.

Here is another brief collection of videos showing our impressive God's creation with the science of it highlighted.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Moody
• Science
• Bible
• Jesus
• Christ

[gregrutz]

Believe in a God?  Which one?

[KingJamesBible]

@gregrutz According to God, he doesn't know of any other God than himself.

Isaiah44:8 Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.

[AtheistStrikeForce]

OK finally a religious claim. I can say this man's opinion is not compatible with science. Science does not make assumptions with testing it for evidence. So far there is no evidence that a God is responsible for the creation of the universe. There is no reason to add God just because we don't know. Remember to people like this God is a pocket of ever receding ignorance. Meaning when we say, God did it we usually discover a scientific reason for it down the line and our ignorance gets smaller.

[gregrutz]

The sun is complex. I don't understand who designed the nuclear reactions in it's center. That is why I believe in Ra the sun god. It was the simplest way to explain it.

[Noobstur323]

@KingJamesBible

And there is no such a thing as religion too. Religion is bad.

[22complexity]

very beautiful video.

[KingJamesBible]

@gregrutz There is no god #1, 2, etc. There is ONE God ONLY and any good catholic should know this as it just happenes to be Catholic teaching as well as Bible teaching. One of the FEW things we should be agreeing to.

1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, (SAME God, not a DIFFERENT one) justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

[Flareondf2]

@gregrutz Hahaha I do not believe everything everyone tells me, but you yourself are quick to believe what a man tells you are you not? You don't know me, I HAVE looked at the fossil record, biology, and geology and I have come to the conclusion that the Bible is true. It is NOT a fact that the world is millions of years old. Just because you say it doesn't make it true. Neanderthals may not be homo sapian sapian. What does that prove? Nothing. So what do you have? Nothing.

[gregrutz]

@Flareondf2 All 600 of the Neanderthals did not ahve arthritis, creationist bull shit.

Your worldview means you believe anything your pastor tell you because you have never looked at the fossil record or geology or biology.

It is a fact that the world is millions of years old, not an interpratation.

It is a fact that Neaderthals are not HOMO SAPIAN SAPIANS. DNA proves it.

[Flareondf2]

@gregrutz Classification is determined by definition. My definition of a fish fits a whale therefore a whale is a fish. Classification means nothing. Was Neanderthal human? Yes, a human with arthritis. Haha you are so easily distracted, back to the real issue. We all have the same facts and your interpretation of the facts is determined by your worldview, creation or evolution. Niether creation nor evolution are science, they are simply interpretations of the facts, science.

[gregrutz]

@Flareondf2 No, they were classified by their anatomy. But some things like mushroom are hard to classify until DNA was decoded. DNA proves Neanderthals were human but not us, a different kind of human.

[Flareondf2]

@gregrutz So animals cannot be classified without their DNA?