Brownback Ducks Question on Gay Adoption

Senator Sam Brownback ducks question on gay adoption.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Brownback
• President
• 2008
• Gay
• Adoption
• Marriage
• Family
• Same-Sex

[lolala15]

What about women or men that are infertile? Should they also not be allowed to adopt because nature hasn't allowed them procreate?

[justcornelius]

what a stupid comment.. i know a gay male couple who have two kids a 23 yr old guy whos studying medicine, hes married and they have a child on the way.. he is mature intelligent kind conciderate.. hes everythign u would want ure child to grow up to be.. the other is a 16 yr old girl who is a straight A's student and very happy with life.. they are so good with these kids.. their home is very loving and they couldnt be more supportive

[imanerd36]

This man makes me ashamed to be from Kansas.

[ColdLance]

The purpose from a evolutionary standpoint would be they increase the chances of species' to survive and reproduce. Always making up a small percentage of the population, one of the reasons evolution placed them there was cover for hetero-parents who messed up the care of their young. This can been seen in humans and also other primeapes.

Therefore homsexuality IS "normal" as per biology from that point alone.

And even if it was not, why from that would it mean that is should then illgeal?

[ColdLance]

"Human physiology makes it clear that the body was not designed for so-called anal "sex" practiced by most homosexuals."

Put many people can get pleasure from it none the less.

"It is clear from natural design that homosexuality is an anomaly."

Unture. Homosexuality would be dieing out if this was. Homosexuals have purposes from a evolutionary stand point.

[ColdLance]

"Other physical problems associated with anal intercourse are hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal trauma and retained foreign bodies."

Agreed however if someone wishes to take those risks they should have the freedom to choose. It is not an argument to take away the freedom of one to choose.

[ColdLance]

It is not an arguement to why homosexuals shouldn't have the right to choose to take part in anal sex.

Also please provide sources on that as I there are many sources stating otherwise.

For example Washington having a huge hetro population carrying aids.

[Exciteme777]

Homsexuality isn't "normal" as per biology. It is clear from natural design that homosexuality is an anomaly. Organically speaking there is a definition of normality re: function. Homosexuality is not normal because sex cant actually be performed as intended. Doctors study the organs all the time to determine their functions; fortunately for us nature made it easy to see the intended purpose of genitalia as they are on the outside of the body.

[Exciteme777]

Human physiology makes it clear that the body was not designed for so-called anal "sex" practiced by most homosexuals. The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants and is supported by a network of muscles. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction w/out damage and resist immunological actions caused by semen and sperm.

[Exciteme777]

However, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an "exit-only" passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic. The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood.