Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet (1954) part 4 of 13
Top Comments
All Comments (60)
-
You know, I disagree, I liked better the 1996 version, though it had awfully ackward parts (I don't remember Mercutio having gays aspirations), but I always imagined his character as fun and erratic, Romeo as skeptical and emotional, Juliet sweet and naïve, and even Juliet's mother filled my perspective on her. The only one I didn't imagine quite that extravagant was Friar Laurence.
-
the stillness of the night, when blackbirds sing there hearts content,but listen my dear friend,the clashing of words but far away,what will tomorrow bring,
-
I always try to stick around for the punchline, but getting through this play....ugh. All of the falling in love stuff is just so insipid - and I know it's probably meant to be, to make the end that much more ironic. But 2.5 hours? Can't do it. At least, can't do it today.
-
I don't know I'm more of a fan of the 1996 version. I found more emotion in it. When they were trying to be emotional in the 1968 version it just didn't seem that they were that upset. But the one in 1968 is still good.
-
1968 version was respectful, but the emotional scenes were hardly riveting or captivating. Of course, it's hard to sob and cry on the spot, but they didn't do much justice to the tragedy of Shakespeare's masterpiece of Romeo & Juliet- sounded and looked fake often. In spite of what i've said, I still liked it tho!
-
This is an actors version. They speak the speech.
-
@Mal3nar0xi3 does anyone know where I can watch the 1968 version. I can't seem to find it on youtube.
-
this is my second favorite version but the 1968 version was def the best
-
This isn't Olivia Hussey, this is Susan Shetnall. Olivia Hussey is in the 1968 version.
i agree with u the 1968 version was th BEST EVER
Mal3nar0xi3 3 years ago 50
this is good but 1968 was kinda the best- Leonard whiting (romeo) was really hot and the girl who played juliet was very beautiful and sweet as juliet
JacobXMe44 3 years ago 30