South Towers Anomalies -- Busted!

Title: "South Tower Anomalies III -- Busted!"
This video demonstrates that ThoughtCrime7s video "South Tower Anomalies III Addressing the Debunkers" is disinformation. In the introduction to that video, the author claims the following: "This movie does NOT try to prove NPT (no-planes theory), only fake news." The video proves nothing of the sort.
Please look at the following references before commenting on anything.
Another example of a high camera position, on 9/11
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPIX
Empire State Antennae
http://www.lnl.com/esbantennas.htm
About WPIX
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/index.html?curid=2974143
Check out the shots of the North Tower roof area, in the helicopter shot: smoke can be seen swirling around on top of it, which is why it appears as though the static camera is higher than it is. There are many articles about lenses and photography on the Internet, but some of the terminology can apply to several related aspects of a subject. I have used the term "positional parallax" in relation to images of the same subject which have been taken by cameras in different positions.
The term "perspective distortion", in this case, relates to images recorded by cameras having long focal-length lenses, which have a narrow angle-of-view. Narrow-angle lenses tend to distort perspectives, which leads to a distortion of the size relationships of different objects in an image. For example: in a shot taken along a railway line, a long lens will make it appear as though the rails stay almost parallel to each other, as they recede into the distance, whereas a wide-angle lens will make it appear as though they rapidly converge to a point. Helicopter cameras, because they usually have to stay well away from their subjects, have zoom lenses whose long end can have an angle of view under 2º.
The importance of recognising the effect of perspective distortion, particularly when coupled to motion parallax, cannot be overstressed in relation to the many shots taken of the plane and the Twin Towers, on 9/11. A lack of understanding of these phenomena is the reason why so many people have fallen for Simon Shacks video about the Verrazano Narrows Bridge "moving" during some of the helicopter shots. It really is distressing to see that there are so many gullible people about.
There are several other errors, in ThoughtCrime7s video, which I have not bothered with, for example: the angle-of-view demonstration, at time-counter 05:53 which is concerned with why one of the cameras didnt capture the image of a helicopter in its frame while videoing the Towers. The error is that the "arms" of the angle-of-view graphic emanate from the subject, when they should, of course, be related to a camera.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 9/11
• lies
• falsehoods
• disinformation
• complicity
• south
• tower
• wtc
• plane
• fake
• news
• government
• terror
• misdirection

[tuffvibes1972]

Where you went wrong MR Lawson is channelling your energy into the wrong thing!

If, as you say, you disagree with the events that day then make a video detailing why you disagree, focus on the real deception in hand, not some silly theories that do not uncover the real story. Peace. :)

[alawson911]

@tuffvibes1972

Lies and misguided explanations of the 9/11 attacks are just as damaging as the 9/11 Commission's report claiming that the planes were hijacked. The mass media love it when stupid people claim there were no-planes in New York, because it deflects research away from the real issues. Look at my video "9/11: The Unidentified Murder Weapons" and see where I have put some of my energies. Where have you put your energies? It seems into criticising someone who cares about the truth.

[tuffvibes1972]

What exactly is the purpose of the video? To enlarge your e-penis somehow? We all know that this was a set up, so maybe put your efforts into researching what really went on, and while you are at it can you do a video on why one of the most important high security buildings in America (Pentagon) was not able to capture a supposed plane hitting the building on CCTV? Your energy is wasted on this trash video, do some proper research and come back with some real answers...

[alawson911]

@tuffvibes1972

With regard to the Pentagon: the lack of video evidence from around a building bristling with video cameras points to one of the biggest cover-ups in the history of CC-TV surveillance. Shortly after whatever happened at the Pentagon, the FBI collected all video material from private premises, which has been suppressed, ever since. So the FBI would be the people who could help with your request for some "real answers", because I am not in the habit of making things up.

[alawson911]

@tuffvibes1972

I don't normally respond to such crudity, but your lack of logic should not go unchallenged. You are clearly one of those people who think that someone who criticises no-planes videos accepts the official story. In my case, you are wrong. The official story is totally unacceptable, but that does not mean that there were no planes or that the media was putting out doctored videos. So why don't you tell me exactly where you think I went wrong? Generalities are meaningless.

[tuffvibes1972]

I listened to a radio show you were on in 2008 where you claimed about eye witness reports, then when questioned you could not provide a source, very suspicious. Also banning members from making comments on other videos show's you are in fear of certain people's responses. Why would anyone go to the lengths you have if they were not hiding something?

[tuffvibes1972]

'A very large plane flew over my building'  what building was that supposed to be?

[dominic150]

@alawson911 very good vid. two thumbs up on this one.

[beachcomber2008]

This is great. Thanks. :)

[alawson911]

@nebula25x

The BBC's claim that it was a mistake does not ring true. I suspect that someone got the pages of the script out of order. One thing that is rarely mentioned is that the studio announcer, who is talking to Jane Standley, who is telling us that WTC7 has just collapsed while it can be seen, still standing, over her left shoulder, asks her something like "... are the people in the street talking about revenge?" Why would he ask that, before any hint of who was to blame had surfaced?

[tuffvibes1972]

PS: I put my energies into charity fund raising, far better than debunking stuff that no one really cares about.

[tuffvibes1972]

Who cares whether there were planes or not, worry about the important issues like who really did this and why. You are wasting you energy on the wrong things imo.