Dinesh D'Souza Gets Owned on the Historicity of Jesus

In a debate with christpher hitchens and dennis prager, dinnesh gets owned by hitchens (with a few of my comments)

Music: Kashmir by Led Zeppelin

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Dinesh
• D'Souza
• Christopher
• Hitchens
• Debate
• Dennis
• Prager
• Atheism
• Christianity
• God
• is
• not
• great

[GoodyBob]

What BS. Hitch knew little of historical Jesus, & like Dawkins, nor ever researched sufficiently or truthfully. If one were to dismiss of all the records & archaeological support of Jesus, you woyuld have to do that & block MOST of ancient history! By far, most REAL historians & scholars agree Jesus existed, including the agnostic & atheist scholars...the only debate was His divinity. Period.

[dwheel39]

why is this vid titled "dinesh gets owned"? This vid is ridiculous. Thanks for flaunting your ignorance but keep the "sports fan" mentality ("gets owned") for sports or ripping on justin beiber or Kardashian clip. It's probably best to critique an intellectual dialogue in an intellectual, or rational manner. These "gets owned" youtube vids are the technological equivalent of throwing tomatoes...funny and primitive but can't be taken seriously.

peace

[punnet2]

@GoodyBob If you would review our brief exchange, you would notice that all I asked was for you to provide archaeological evidence for jesus, which you claimed to have; I made no claims of my own. Your response was wholly inadequate (archaeological evidence for a pool is not archaeological evidence for jesus), along with baseless accusations.

Please dispense with the asperions and provide the archaeological evidence for jesus you claimed to have or admit that you in fact don't.

[GoodyBob]

@punnet2 You asked for some archaeological support. Again I'm too busy to prove to you all I know. Go argue with the vast majority of REAL scholars(including atheistic ones) who have NO DOUBT the existence of Jesus is fact. Instead you prefer reading the new age garbage like even Ehrman, who is an epic fail also. Instead, you follow whatever the book of the month is.The world was changed drastically at the time of His resurrection. 1 +1= 2, now try 1 + thousands of support. No Ipads 2000 yrs ago

[punnet2]

@GoodyBob Evidence of a pool is not evidence that someone magically cured someone's blindness with mud and saliva near that pool.

And what do the Pauline letters or the gospels have to do with your original claim? Paul never met jesus, and the earliest gospel (mark) is dated to decades after jesus supposedly died. Neither of these, therefore, suffice as "archaeological evidence for jesus".

Your bar for credibility is depressingly low.

[punnet2]

@GoodyBob Try paying careful attention, please. The practice of crucifixion; the historicity of Pilate; and the existence of particular locations in Palestine are not in question. The evidence for such things does not amount to archaeological evidence of jesus himself, which you claimed to have.

This is about as useful as archaeological evidence of London serving as evidence for Harry Potter 2,000 years from now.

[GoodyBob]

@punnet2 They just found The Pool of Siloam where Jesus is said to have healed the blind man. The skeptics said it never existed, but it's there with the tunnel & 5 cisterns EXACTLY as described in the Gospels. See the Pauline undisputed letters/gospels. The Ryland Fragment. Please research & not the new trash like Dan Brown...there's tons of stuff friend. See some of the 200 vids on my channel. See Biblical archaeology sites also. Bye.

[GoodyBob]

@punnet2 LOL. Thanks, but I'm not gonna research for you & I don't have 10 hrs to tell you all I have studied for yrs. You must of not seen the pics of the evidence of crucifixion with the Roman nail. They have found St. Peter's house, Caphaius' house, the Pontius Pilate stone, wedding location where Jesus turned water to wine, etc. See Sir William Ramsay famous ex-atheist archaeologist(not the chemist) who tried proving Luke/Acts wrong. After yrs of digs he said Luke was correct in every detail

[punnet2]

@GoodyBob Sorry, but the site you provided was sadly lacking. I asked for archaeological evidence in support of jesus himself; not archaeological evidence for 1st century Judaism, Pontius Pilate or the practice of crucifixion, which is all the site provided.

In other words, it does not appear you actually have archaeological evidence for jesus as you claimed.

[GoodyBob]

@zzzak123 Thank you....you are right these new age clones want to see vidz on their Ipads of of pics at the PROVEN trial of Jesus. They will believe any new book with crap that comes along against most un-biased scholars & search for their love of conspiracy theories FO HOURS before reading one word of real history & links proving Jesus or anything good. It's a modern sickness. God bless.

[GoodyBob]

@lapmarty You are the one that is so sadly blind. According to your "legend in your own mind" rules of history...you would need to throw out & block ALL of history because you weren't there. You do not exist either then cuz' I can't see you. LOL. You need to also throw out all courts of law since it relies on witnesses also. Get a life & research. Adios.

[lapmarty]

@GoodyBob indoctrination is accepting a hypothesis on how the world works, without any evidence,

did you see jesus miracle? did you see the talking snake, (absurd) adam and eve, is a mythe we known that, evrething in thos book is base on primitive mythology, yet amazingly some beleive that shit, they got evrething wrong, the age of the earth, EVRETHING, you beleived the law of physic has been suspended by jesus christ, but you beleive that base on one thing, A BOOK TELL SO,pathetic