sam is a lie. Look at my videos. The Royal Bloodline of Jesus is the Quesenberry Bloodline and it's a bloodline of Rape. They raped Him before He was crucified.
@ukrainman20 the evidence is seen as either his body was moved with his wife or he did not die or possibly was never crucified. Remember many people were crucified in ancient times and did not die... but some did. To understand the history correctly one must understand the times in which this all took place.
@xSsj3Sasukex actually you are sadly misinformed and merely quoting what you think is correct with absolutely no evidence outside of a Text created by people who never were there and canonized by a Roman emperor who demanded a council to form one church under one story in the 3rd century. So who now is the one whom is loaded with shit? It is better to be thought a fool rather than open your mouth and remove all doubt. Does the use of logic and possibilities elude you?
They're wrong to claim that it's descended from Christ, but this mark goes all the way back to Cain being marked by God. Their fiction story about being descendants of Jesus will play right along in with their Antichrist.
Its very difficult to believe anything, just as I think the truth is about to be anounced someone else has another theory, so frustrating!
amopower1 7 months ago
sam is a lie. Look at my videos. The Royal Bloodline of Jesus is the Quesenberry Bloodline and it's a bloodline of Rape. They raped Him before He was crucified.
downyourtube 7 months ago
Alright, I think it's about to come clean to you all. I am a descendent of Jesus Christ. We can all stop arguing now, it will all be alright.
D1CHHH 7 months ago
There is a birthmark alright , but it isn't on the outside of the body. Nice try though.
TheIAMINU 8 months ago
What a crock of B.S. for sure. This birthmark is the same demonic sign all the devil worshipping cults have used.
NRGMedicine 8 months ago
yeah..through His earthly step-brothers, step-sisters, etc...
ruthgreene 9 months ago
THIS IS A HOAX!
Zeuxis5511 10 months ago
@ukrainman20 the evidence is seen as either his body was moved with his wife or he did not die or possibly was never crucified. Remember many people were crucified in ancient times and did not die... but some did. To understand the history correctly one must understand the times in which this all took place.
IXianGriffin 1 year ago
@xSsj3Sasukex actually you are sadly misinformed and merely quoting what you think is correct with absolutely no evidence outside of a Text created by people who never were there and canonized by a Roman emperor who demanded a council to form one church under one story in the 3rd century. So who now is the one whom is loaded with shit? It is better to be thought a fool rather than open your mouth and remove all doubt. Does the use of logic and possibilities elude you?
IXianGriffin 1 year ago
They're wrong to claim that it's descended from Christ, but this mark goes all the way back to Cain being marked by God. Their fiction story about being descendants of Jesus will play right along in with their Antichrist.
TheRegulator1984 1 year ago