Lockdown - San Quentin State Prison (2/5)
Top Comments
All Comments (305)
-
@LOLHICRONO There is a big difference. Making violence legal means we'd have less violence-related crime (because it would no longer be a crime), but the violent actions would still exist. By comparison, regulating drug sales and protecting drug possessors would drastically reduce drug-related violence because it would mostly eliminate its causes.
-
@torqtorqtorq ya bro, by that logic if we made violence legal we'd have "less x,y,z"
-
what if you are mixed or asian?
-
@tromboista I'm talking about violence directly related to the black market. People don't break into your house and rob you at gunpoint for your alcohol. This is because you probably don't have a huge stockpile of it since you're not the distributor, and since it's legal to own, you have protection from the police. If police protected drug possessors, there would be less crime, and therefore less people dead or in prison for life.
-
@torqtorqtorq Like there are less robberies and alcohol related violence because alcohol is legal?
-
@ThleTruth yes he is
-
"break it off in him!"
-
@torqtorqtorq Right on!
-
HAHAHA what losers in here.
-
@ILOVECHICKEN69 copy and paste from wikipedia, you didn't know who he was either
Notice how many of these guys are in for life for violence related to drugs? Making drugs illegal clearly hasn't stopped them from being used, it just creates a black market where law enforcement can't and won't protect anyone. Sellers/possessors must protect themselves. If drugs were sold in stores, and possessing them was legal, there would be less robberies and less street justice. Drugs would still be used, but less people would die, and less people would be in prison.
torqtorqtorq 2 weeks ago 8
Who is Scott Peterson?
BigLiam123 1 month ago 4