Greenpeace on nuclear power
Loading...
Loading...
25:22
Inside Story - Japan's looming nuclear crisisby AlJazeeraEnglish70,975 views- 2:28
Explosion at nuclear plant in Japanby AlJazeeraEnglish561,863 views
- 25:00
Riz Khan - The nuclear power debateby AlJazeeraEnglish7,908 views
- 3:30
Professor comments on Japan's nuclear crisisby AlJazeeraEnglish14,645 views
- 4:37
How nuclear energy worksby ENECeducation316,748 views
- 0:58
Nuclear warhead convoy on motorwayby ground00037,156 views
- 2:08
Japan quake: Witnessing hellby newsxlive54,592 views
- 1:38
Nuclear is not the answerby gpsea893 views
- 5:42
david lange Oxford Union Debate, 1 March 1985by shadowsinmylove40,279 views
- 0:51
Thousands form human chain in protest against nuclear...by Euronews5,600 views
- 6:37
Greenpeace - Dangers of Nuclear Energy - Video 2by videosINO2,086 views
- 5:03
Japan Nuclear Power Plant Meltdown Risk Global Apocalypseby killuminati33119,488 views
- 4:57
Myth: Nuclear Energy is Dangerousby populartechnology17,390 views
- 7:43
Agora - Nuclear Energy: friend or foe to the environment?by Euronews4,782 views
- 3:41
Greenpeace: Stopping Amazon Deforestationby EarthOutreach30,712 views
- 0:47
Greenpeace - Nuclear Power VS Planeby badassmofo217,553 views
- 9:27
The Convenient Solutionby GreenpeaceUK95,520 views
- 9:06
Nuclear Powerby Libertarianist38,171 views
- 4:33
Greenpeace co-founder says uranium mining is done safely around the worldby vaenergyindependence407 views
- 1:43
Greenpeace Videoby Mailllo497,478 views
what a prick. distorting the facts.
en1841 1 month ago
@CobaltX07
Sadly, people aren't that logical. Nuclear power causes far less deaths per TWH than any other source - 0.04, while the next safest, hydroelectrical, is at 0.1 - but all greenpeace care about is is scaremongering, and it's easy to do that with nuclear power.
jimmyboyG485 2 months ago
@sweetscience1988 We can also recycle it to make more fuel using breeder reactors, if the UK used breeders to produce all of it's electricity the country would produce less nuclear waste than it currently is. Moving it around is unessecessary, it can just be left to decay.
EquusFerrarius 8 months ago
@EquusFerrarius we can move it around, recycle it in weapons but thats about it
sweetscience1988 8 months ago
@sweetscience1988 Why can't we?
EquusFerrarius 8 months ago
@yousaytomatoisaywhy look at australia place is litered in radioactive waste, once the money has been made they dont care, just close down and move out
sweetscience1988 8 months ago
@EquusFerrarius the earth maybe able to deal with it, but we cant
sweetscience1988 8 months ago
@Mineretta2012 I've sent you an article, I was told about it by a friend who referenced it in his degree thesis.
EquusFerrarius 8 months ago
@EquusFerrarius That is interesting. Did you make that up or do you have Scientific and Historical documents to back up your statement. Either way I am interested in hearing more.
Mineretta2012 8 months ago
@Mineretta2012 There was an entirely natural nuclear fission reaction in what is now Africa, It occured 2 billion years ago and continued for 100,000 years. The nuclear waste produced just sat their and decayed, it moved no more than a few meters in 2 billion years. The earth is more than capable of dealing with nuclear waste, it was producing it long before humans stumbled nuclear power.
EquusFerrarius 9 months ago