Richard Dawkins Converted to Space Religion
Top Comments
All Comments (62)
-
Believing is space aliens is still less stupid than believing in "jinns" and that heaven is where meteorite come from lol
-
@Xmaggot93X The guy who posted this is a muslim, and your a retard
-
@fatface5454 Neither one of them believe that a lightning bolt hit a crystal. Richard Dawkins never said he believed that intelligent aliens seeded life on Earth, but merely offered it as a possibility. I can say it's entirely possible that the Christian God exists, but it is very unlikely and that is why I don't believe it. If you'd just listen Richard Dawkins says no one knows the origin of life yet. There is no theory on the origin of life, but speculation, most prominently abiogenesis.
-
@Xirbtt you could consider his first question loaded, but from his perspective it is a logical question to ask. dawkins said he dident like it so stein changed the question....this leads you to believe he is dishonest?
-
Yea...Ben stein is soo dumb, I mean, who WOULDN'T wanna believe all life came from a lightning bolt hitting a crystal...or from aliens. The man said what he said, stop trying to act like he didn't.
-
Oh Ben Stein you fucking idiot. Did you even listen to Dawkins?
Life starting on another planet and rooting itself onto Earth is NOT intelligent design because it has nothing to do with any sort of deity or divinity. Dawkins said TWICE that the on the other planet may have risen up from Darwinian, non-creationist means.
-
Funny how all of the videos posted supporting Christianity have no option for like/dislike.
Take your dislikes like a man. You're wrong. Just accept reality, stupid fucking Christian.
-
ben stein just lost all his credibility.
-
Evolution: 100 points
God: 0 points
Ancient Astronauts: 10 points
-
Aliens jacked off in the ocean and created life on Earth.
This is stupid. He doesn't say he believes this only that it isn't out of the realm of possibility, just very unlikely. Ben stein is a hawkish weiner of a man.
theblankgeneration1 2 years ago 19
Richard Dawkins has already shown the interviewee was dishonest in his approach and this has already been explained. I can't believe people accept this as proof of anything.
Xirbtt 2 years ago 17