Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

HST NOT for ME!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,699
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 13, 2009

Humour, YES. HST, NO!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • we need a new king to the throne of Bristish Columbia all hail king cummins

  • @Disturbedfan009 i will agree to that

  • the HST is dead but if he had listened to the people of BC this tax would have never been put in place dont you agree

  • Did you know Campbell voted himself a 54% pay raise in 2007? So his salary for that year was $186,000. And now he wants more so he makes this HST. So everytime I buy something, I have to pay him 12% of what a bought.

  • @BCLibFan You are a loser just like the scum of a Premier you worship. Gordo has lied through his teeth on more than 1 count to get elected (as have most of the BC Liars). The HST is SOLELY to garner revenue to make up for the $165-million+ cost overruns of Gordo's stupid little party called the Owelympics. Your lies (and Gordo's) won't change that.

  • @nicks100 Not DAMN LIKELY. Business won't reduce the prices; they'll just pocket the difference as profit. You believe this tax is revenue-neutral, I have a bridge for sale. In the words of an ex-Miami judge, I wouldn't believe Gordo if his tongue came notarized.

  • I wish this S.O.B drove into a volcano while driving drunk in hawaii.

  • Well maybe in the next election, the people of B.C. will tell Gordon Campbell and his Liberal party just two words. YOUR FIRED.

  • @nicks100

    So the HST is revenue neutral, so what? All "revenue neutral" means is that the government doesn't make any extra tax dollars in the process. If our costs increase by X amount, and that amount is passed on to big business, then its revenue neutral. If you believe the Stats Canada report, the HST will cost a family of four an additional $821/year. They should feel good about that? The big winner is big business and the bigger the business, the bigger the windfall.

  • We assume that Nicks100 is one of the blinded Liberal supporters on the HST but in his blind allegiance to Gordon Campbell, he is conveniently ignoring a key fact:

    1. We presume he isn't aware that government's definition of "revenue neutral", is that it doesn't getting any additional revenue in the process. If it increases our costs through the HST by, say, $500 in increased taxes and puts it in the bank accounts of business, that is "revenue neutral" in their eyes. It isn't in ours!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more