Re: 9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained
Loading...
Uploaded by gamingeagle19 on Aug 13, 2008
READ DESCRIPTION FIRST!!!
as you can all tell this is the same video from RKOwens4, however I have added some of my own takes on the matter of the whole inside job conspiracy theory at the end of the video. It's obvious what is mine. I also added my own music.
Metallica-"Nothing Else Matters"
Video used with permission from RKOwens4
Please note that I will allow anyone to post a comment. I want this to be a debate friendly zone. That means that if anyone resorts to personal insults to an extreme degree or is just being a jackass I will kick you off. You have been warned. Also, I will automatically remove any comments that aren't questions about this video. That way, CT's can't change the subject.
Link to this comment:
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (107)
-
All these points and more covered in "Where did the Towers go?" Evidence is evidence, right....
-
none of the calls from the inside of the WTC mention anything like this... I'm sure you would actually noticed everything inside and none of them talk about the floors sagging down
-
@BrotherGiles I can barely read that gibberish. Frankly it doesn't matter how resistant they were to heat. They can't survive an impact from a jumbo jet. The beams didn't have to melt either, just weaken. If you are trying to hold up a massive building it isn't a good thing if the metal beams aren't at full strength.
-
@gamingeagle19 hours that an extortionate word to use also i meant 2000f. its no common sense in this video at all this video bends truth to the limit to even post it is silly end of.
-
@BrotherGiles Okay fine you can treat it to make it more resistant to heat but nowhere did I see that it made the steel withstand up to 2000 degrees Celsius. On that part you are wrong. Besides, the steel was mostly destroyed along the impact path and many floors above and below that point got all the fire proofing blown off. Add in the intense heat for hours and it's common sense why the beams failed.
-
@gamingeagle19 unfortunately your wrong !!!!!!! steel is made of iron and carbon + others iron weakens at 1500f look up steal hardening in google
-
@BrotherGiles @BrotherGiles "the world trade center steal was made to with stand 2000c for up to 4 hours minimum silly"
/facepalm
Oh God the stupidity.
You can't "make" steel withstand temperatures that high. Steel is steel you fucking retard.
-
@BrotherGiles "the world trade center steal was made to with stand 2000c for up to 4 hours minimum silly"
/facepalm
Oh God the stupidity.
You can't "make" steel withstand temperatures that high. Steel is steel you fucking retard.
-
@gamingeagle19 the world trade center steal was made to with stand 2000c for up to 4 hours minimum silly. don't you know about the way the building was made?? if you don't then why post this video.
-
@BrotherGiles 2000c? Oh my God that's hilarious.
It only needs to be 1500F to weaken steel.
Sorry but your "science" is the one that's distorted. Get your stupidity off my video.
2:11Truthers Schooled By NISTby buddhaglass2,311 views
- 1:34NORTH TOWER - Ch20by achimspok12,527 views
- 6:13MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Col...by muzicmaker2001283,368 views
- 3:589/11 Debunked: WTC "Base Smoke" Identifiedby RKOwens452,194 views
- 2:58YouTube 9 11 Debunked World Trade Center N...by abu137316 views
- 6:01Debunking 9/11 Debunkers: Pancake Theoryby JewFor911Truth9,737 views
- 1:459/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CEN...by world1vision508,422 views
- 9:08The 9/11 Conspiracies - Fact Or Fiction Debunke...by Jonny35jj5,664 views
- 3:559/11 Debunked: Firefighters in the Impact Zoneby RKOwens440,584 views
- 3:529/11 Debunked: BBC Early Report on WTC 7 Collap...by RKOwens444,724 views
- 2:169/11 - Towers did NOT fall at free fall speed!by iamthejake200080,509 views
- 3:599/11 Debunked: WTC 7's Collapse Explainedby RKOwens4268,859 views
- 4:16Controlled Demolition vs. WTC Collapseby muzicmaker200166,150 views
- 2:49Shot from street level of South Tower collapsingby CameraPlanetArchive896,247 views
- 8:489/11 Rare Footageby aliceangel73,604,639 views
- 3:519/11 Debunked: "Molten Metal" Explainedby RKOwens4144,159 views
- 1:379/11 There Is Another Plane Headed Toward The W...by IranContraScumDid9111,490 views
- 0:50Never before seen Video of WTC 9/11 attackby JmanFIVEk20,455,363 views
- 2:09WTC collapse, NBC, 9/11, 17:42by 11septembervideos23,828 views
- 3:589/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Ex...by RKOwens4290,687 views
the test, in which the heat was doubled and it still only sagged 4 inches. all the test has to show is, would the fire in the wtc's be able to sag the floors, the corragurgated steel and the concrete on top of that, enough to pull those walls in.
the test failed and so the theory fails.
I'd like to see the test done over and filmed.If I had the money I would do it
and I would bet any one(again if I had the money) a million dollars that the floors would not sag even close enough .
sublimy99 2 years ago 4
Sorry, but the NIST-bowing-theory is completely nonsense. The floor had to sag about 3 meters to pull the column 55 inches inwards (in an area without any visible fire until 10:00am and - according to NIST - without any damage of the fireproofing). The NIST-full-scale-test reached just some inches of floor sagging after 2 hours constantly burning. And of course the columns neither snapped nor broke while snapping because the whole top tilted. A snapping column had to lift the whole top first.
achimspok 3 years ago 4