Comparison FSX with and without Global 2010
Uploader Comments (sqdldr)
Top Comments
-
can not see the diferent
-
I do not see any difference at all!
All Comments (20)
-
hi.the problem is that you have rex,gex and utx!because rex,gex and utx do it very buitiful so you should have make a video where you only have default fsx and global 2010!
-
not much difference mate
-
@Peccatamundi2011 It has big difference in areas with more elevation differences. Of course there is not much difference in flat land area, but in areas with more mountainous terrain its very big difference. Also this video is from nothern flat and boring area of Sweden, and whole Europe is modeled in higher quality than for example most of Asia and Africa where the difference really is very big.
Also I recommend fsgenesis world mesh, its just as good as fsglobal.
-
40gb goes down!!!!!!!
-
I am not convinced to buy FS global 2010 by watching this video... Not so much difference... Do you lose FPS?
-
@suicidebomber115 Yup, not quite on the same hugeness level of X-plane 9 (which is around 75GB) but still a whopping 40, 43GB ish.
-
Nice Video!! :) But what dose Global 2010 really do:?
-
Dear sqdldr,
I have FSglobal2010 but i don't how to use it !!!
Could you give a tutorial or something ??
I suggest you post a video tutorial abut set up it...
Very Beautiful video...i jealousy you :(
Hi.
Nice vid, but to be honest you could have picked a better place to show off FS Global. I had FS Global 2008 SE, and I used to show it off to people in the valleys and hills of Wales in the UK, and the Brecon Beacons, now this would make people see the difference much clearer.
sb55mv 10 months ago
@sb55mv true. but on the other side it shows that Global isn't needed if you primarily fly in northern Sweden.
sqdldr 10 months ago
Nice video! Now I know for sure if it works!
TheGreatFlyer 1 year ago
@TheGreatFlyer thank you
sqdldr 1 year ago