9/11 Arthur Del Bianco at WTC: Three tremendous explosions
Top Comments
All Comments (18)
-
Also we all have rights to:Believe want we want to, say what we want to, and many more. Im pretty sure every one here is mature enough to not be stupid and fight over somthing that happend 10 years ago. Now i do realize that over 2,000 people died(may they rest in peace) but you guys need to pick your head up and focus on whats happening in a post 9/11 world. Sence we caught Bin Ladin our chances of getting hit by a dirty bomb are much higher. Thank you for your time.
-
All the 9/11 "thurthers" as they call them selves, that at are at Ground Zero every September 11th go up to the families that are there to remember loved ones and start to bother them is just hurting the families even more. Now dont get all pissed at me for writing this but i believe that the government had no involvement in 9/11. And if you think differently, then thats your opinion and i respect your opinion because you have a right to say your opinion. Please dont start a fight over this.
-
The "bullet shots" were demo charges, many people heard, and saw their flashes in the various buildings.
-
watch?v=MCiDKxzpMao
-
building 7 had open-buttresses to accommodate for major open space needed for heating?fuel tanks if I remember correctly.
Please prove that melting points couldn't have been reached in any of the buildings.
Asking questions doesn't make an answer.
-
explain why they found molten steel in wtc 7, 1 , 2
only explosive can explain pyroplastic flows , and 1500 f degrees after 4 or 5 weeks and the molten metal , why building 7 fell?
-
If one or more floors fell on another (with also weakened structures) could you imagine that the weight and forces involved might cause a chain reaction of exponentially increasing weight and forces?
Also,
I saw the fires 1st hand and I don't think it's definitive from anything I've seen on posts on melted metals.
It was a blast-furnace of unprecedented scale.
If you can post something that shows accurately what temperatures were actually reached (not theoretically) I'd be interested.
-
of course not but even if the building on the hot spot melted or weakened only that part would have desapeared....the lower floors cold and strong as always would still be there, but anyway if we agree the melting point is not possible as a natural byproduct from the fires explain why they found molten steel in wtc7, 1 , 2
-
the three loud explosions are anyone's guess.
maybe this maybe that.
here's one. three main supports gave way. do you know there weren't any that at that point in time would have succumbed to the forces involved?
We can ask all the questions we want (a major tactic of many skeptics) and never provide real answers but that doesn't make facts.
Controlled demolition no doubt!
ladollyvita 4 years ago 11
yes i could imagine that in a bulding that is NOT a tubular structure, 90% air , with a 47 core columns , the building would never collapse on itself and if it happens because all the core columns where the damage were cut at the same time, will never fall almost in free fall speed, actually it will loose speed until stops, and in case was constantly pankaking would take at least 1 flloor per second...not 10 floors per second
and afterwards you would fine a pile of floors not just dust
period
martyr2005 2 years ago