Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Dr. Greg Jenkins Exposed During Ambush Interview of Dr. Judy Wood

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,037
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Mar 28, 2010

I am very grateful to Dr. Greg Jenkins for conducting his ambush interview of Dr. Judy Wood, because his agenda actually highlighted the importance of Dr. Wood's work. The amount of effort being put forth to attempt to discredit Dr. Wood and convince people to not look at the overwhelming sum of evidence she has gathered is truly remarkable. I find it very interesting that Dr. Jenkins, who works/worked for NSA, showed up with full lighting and camera crews after a talk given by Dr. Fetzer, who had insisted Dr. Wood attend his talk. No one else knew Dr. Wood would be there. Just as she was leaving, around 12am, Jenkins spontaneously confronted Dr. Wood and asked her to do an interview on the spot. Why didn't Dr. Jenkins contact Dr. Wood ahead of time to get advanced permission for the interview? Why didn't Dr. Jenkins attend the conference, but only showed up at the very end of it for the specific purpose of asking Dr. Wood to do this spontaneous interview? Why did Dr. Jenkins show up with full lighting and camera crews, yet he only brought one black and white photo of the thousands of full color photos, videos, documents, and graphs Dr. Wood has gathered, only to later insert the full-color copy of the image into the edited video recording of the interview?

I find it admirable that Dr. Wood was right all along about the fact that the majority of the WTC buildings were transformed to fine dust, especially considering that she has been trying to wake the public up to that fact for over 4 years now. Others are still catching up, as today it is a commonly known fact that the WTC buildings were primarily turned to dust on 9/11. I wonder if Dr. Jenkins has corrected his false claims that the buildings were not turned to dust, or if he still believes the nonsense he was trying to promote throughout the interview... As Dr. Wood often says, you first need to determine WHAT happened, before you determine HOW it happened. If you skip the first part and assume you know what happened, further discussion tends to be rather meaningless and unscientific. Dr. Wood identified that the buildings were transformed to dust, and for some strange reason, Dr. Jenkins really wanted to avoid discussing that topic.

Dr. Judy Wood held strong in her scientific position all these years, and thank goodness she has. Her observations were correct, right from the start. It was this fortitude of hers which has forced Richard Gage (and others) into finally acknowledging the fact that the majority of the WTC buildings turned to dust in mid air. However, that puts Richard Gage and Dr. Steven Jones in a very difficult position, because thermite does not turn buildings into powder in mid air, nor do explosives of any kind... :)

Here is the transcript from the interview, which allows for a more detailed analysis of the dialogue: http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/Jenkins_transcript.html


Here is the official release of Greg Jenkins' original video recording of the interview, which includes the additional content that he added before the video was released: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017

Here is a brief summary of the thousands of photos, videos, graphs, and documents Dr. Judy Wood has gathered, which explosives of any kind do NOT explain: http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc

Has the 9/11 "Truth" Movement Always Been Corrupt? http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_61147.shtml


Thank you for your time, consideration, and help.

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So many childlike attitudes you see from the very people we are meant to trust/admire as the brightest minds. Why would anyone let their pre conceived ideas cloud their judgement so that they. by reflex action, attack someone for painstakingly presenting the most detailed investigation of any given subject?Surely, you look at the evidence first and if it explains what happened better than your own then you should be adult and adapt. The world isnt flat Greg, we adapted our perception over time.

  • @thetableswillturn Well said! He squirmed his way through the interview. He looked like a little boy who has been caught out.His attempts to divert the subject was so obvious that he is shot himself in the foot.

  • @mujaku Maybe he is a part of the cover up? I dont think that its a case of cognitive dissonance,rather a case of not being able to explain what is clearly evidence with his cover up story. Isnt it a shame that these experts cling on to their theory to save face (failed on that) instead of saying 'hmm, I missed that, time to re-evaluate here' For the sake of truth and the scientific method! Dr.Greg,you have been exposed Im afraid.Your work,for me is now worth nothing.Cant take you serious.

  • Jenkins brain....dustified.

    

  • Dr. Greg Jenking is a man with a bad case of cognitive dissonance. He can't seem to wrap his brain round the evidence that a standard demolition is not taking place nor is pancaking. In fact, what is happening is the physical mass of the WTC is disintegrating and turning into dust - it is like the opening scenes of Independence Day (1996).

  • Who is this arrogant asshole?! He looks so worried and disturbed. Why?

  • shame on you jenkins

  • @uchimomogeri "I hope she has some good security around her ( not a threat from me) because this lady is on to something. We really need to get behind her" if they were to kill her (especially after killing her student) they would open up a lot of eyes, i don't think they would be that stupid.

  • @piscesgutt "Greg Jenkins = disinfo agent" yep pretty obvious. Anyone who can look at this guy in this video, (meaning just his overall demeanour/body language) and not see that he's obviously been deceptive has to be a pretty nieve individual.

  • @GodConqueringAlien agreed, good comments

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more