In the beginning people used to say in the debates that she was too polarising, and the only thing that excited a fractured Republican party is uniting in their irrational hatred of Hillary. They used to say that that made her unelectable. They used to say that about her in the NY senate aswell which was proved wrong. That's what I was talking about.
For goodness sake, he was just making his case for Hillary and saying that seeing as Hillary and McCain were friends it would be a debate about issues rather than any distractions. People thought that if Hillary were the nominee it would fire up an irrational Republican party and said she'd therefore be unelectable, but the fact that it's McCain means that's unlikely to happen in a general election against her. That's not making a case against Obama to say he's unpartiotic.
BO in 08
David4946 3 years ago 2
In the beginning people used to say in the debates that she was too polarising, and the only thing that excited a fractured Republican party is uniting in their irrational hatred of Hillary. They used to say that that made her unelectable. They used to say that about her in the NY senate aswell which was proved wrong. That's what I was talking about.
0613162k 3 years ago
"People thought that if Hillary were the nominee it would fire up an irrational Republican party and said she'd therefore be unelectable..."
I'm sorry...what?
mike50333 3 years ago
For goodness sake, he was just making his case for Hillary and saying that seeing as Hillary and McCain were friends it would be a debate about issues rather than any distractions. People thought that if Hillary were the nominee it would fire up an irrational Republican party and said she'd therefore be unelectable, but the fact that it's McCain means that's unlikely to happen in a general election against her. That's not making a case against Obama to say he's unpartiotic.
0613162k 3 years ago