typonegativ

abstract music video

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• mobile
• video
• karlheinz
• stockhausen
• mantra

[shakinjamaican101]

If you like Stockhausen, you might want to look up Krzystof Penderecki: Threnody for the victims of Hiroshima, Flourences for Orchestra so on, also check on George Crumb(Black Angels), John Cage, Daniel Lentz(song of the Sirens)or look up the pioneers of the field such as: Arnold Schoenberg, Albin Berg, Anton Webern and Igor Stravinsky.

[dbdbdb1]

ok) well i did miss out some of 'em. thanx

[xerothirteen13]

this was complete shit. your work sucks ass.

i should sue you for misrepresentation of an established band. you suck i hope you die soon you waste of life. is that your family screaming???

[shakinjamaican101]

I'm sorry that you were conditioned to think diatonically. If you can't enjoy mathematical sequences than I would suggest never to look like an idiot and started criticizing on what you are ignorant of and just never do it again. Thank you.

[dbdbdb1]

yeah yeah i'd like to thank him too? i really had a good laugh

[dbdbdb1]

why, thank you. didn't mean to hurt your feelings here you go black black black black # ooone

[xmfdibujito]

@shakinjamaican101 Yeah, but talking about his music (Im interested in his philosophy, but is not the point here), he has a lottt of records. Some are far away from these aesthetics, I recommend you "Strange Strings". I have one record of Moondog (but it deserves more attention from me : ), but none of Partch, seems very interesting: a big character, he made his own instruments for his own tunning system!

[shakinjamaican101]

@xmfdibujito Sun Ra is something else.... I like his music a lot but his aesthetics are definitely constrained to the 1970's multi-movement of afros in the U.S. believing that the african race belongs to another planet is a definite sad tale and commentary on the way the U.S. was and still probably is on treating the African race. His movie is very interesting in that regard. Another person you might like is Louis Thomas Hardin AKA Moondog, or Harry Partch. Both provide interesting music.

[xmfdibujito]

@shakinjamaican101 I agree. I wrote that only for some "clarification". Schoenberg, Stravinsky, Cage, Varese, Mesiaen, Schaeffer, Stockhausen, Xenakis, Ligeti, Parmegiani... Are "game changers" in music history.

Personaly, I think Stockhausen took it to a extreme, he created a new world... and with good artistic results, thats a important thing that a lot of painters need to learn : )

But also, Im very interested in the others, and others outside the "classical" world, like Sun Ra.

[shakinjamaican101]

@xmfdibujito It's been a few years and I've grown in understanding more music since then. I agree that you can argue what is pioneering or not and that Stravinsky, Schonberg and the lot all instead put more of a revolution of existing music. I've grown to known Edgar Varese and Pierre Schaeffer even more so Iannis Xenakis and to some extent, Gyorgy Ligeti. The whole idea though is to recommend these composers who break the mold of "traditional" music, and provide something new to the table.

[xmfdibujito]

@shakinjamaican101

I dont think that the "pioneers of the field" are these. Stockhausen was a total pioneer of his field. All music history is a continuum, and people like Stravinsky made great revolutions, but what Stocky started was something completely new. In any case, look at Schaeffer and Varese

[dadalaidou]

what's the exact title of the music piece ?

[SublimeDebris]

This is a little gem of a movie. Your visuals seem so natural with the music. Abstraction can be fun!

[uhj4]

If you like experiment in music, just try TACUARA NOD, available on youtube

[sapht]

Directed at

keeskogel3291.

[sapht]

So what's the problem: people who make up 'superior knowlegde' or the idea that modern music might actually also have content and associability comparable to romantic music? Lies the problem within the pseudo-intellectualists, or the subject itself? Does over-interpretation of a subject require the subject to be non-interpretable?