A Long lecture and debate in question & answer form between Sheikh dimashqiah and many Shiah students, young men and women, who belong to the Shiah religion. All their doubts were smashed, it was given on the 24th. of November at the university of kingston. It was a successful comparison between the Sunnah & the Shiah. You just relax, watch & enjoy.
محاضرة ومناظرة طويلة وقوية جدا بين الشيخ دمشقية وبحضور مجموعة من الطلبة والطالبات الشيعة بالانجليزية. وقد عجز الرافضة فيها عن الاجابة وفشلوا في إثبات شبهاتهم المعتادة ضد أهل السنة. ويمكن القول بأن هذه المحاضرة كانت أقوى محاضرة بالللغة الانجليزية ضد الرافضة. وحاول الشيخ الحوار معهم بأرقى أسلوب علمي بعيدا عن المهاترات والصراخ. هدى الله الشيعة.
@ayasalman
yup..............dat umme kulsoom was the daughter of abu bakr and after his death she came to ALi(a.s) house with her mother as her mother got married to Ali(a.s) and it was her mother who gave her daughet ie umme kulsoom to umar.
kamranabbas1985 1 month ago
@Notgoingnowhere
Because Hazrt Ali (RA) belonged to Ahl-e-Sunah and Shias are his deniers.
leitz28 3 months ago
@pillgrimz the bayat i can tell u was not voluntary and was not done in a way that he thought it was right for them to rule..he done it in a way to protect his family and the other Muslims. Umm Kulthoom wasn't his real daughter it was his step daughter the daughter of one of his wives during his lifetime..same goes with Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr was Ali's step son. And in some hadiths it says she married Umar and the others say she didn't. Of Course Ali wasn't scared, but they threatend his family
ayasalman 1 year ago
@pillgrimz No thats that part where ur wrong..according to Shia Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman where not kufr they were Muslims and nobody has a right to call them kafir..but Muslims even them can also become misguided in one way or another..but its whatever bad actions they did that makes the shias and others not like the bad actions. Ali (as) never named his children for the intention of naming them after those campanions those names were already very common those days
ayasalman 1 year ago
@ayasalman sister think about this, according to shia abu bakr, umar and uthman RAA were kufr, yet not only did Ali RA name his children after them , he made baia'a to them and even gave his daugter to marry one of them.you can argue that he was forced to give baia'a but what does tha say abut Ali RA?was he scared?NO he was the lion of islam and scared of nobody. who would marry their daughter to someone who apparently beat there pregnant wife killing there child??? thanks for the cvil reply
pillgrimz 1 year ago
@pillgrimz Im not saying he named his sons just cuz it was popular..no im trying to say that it was a very common name back than..so even naming his sons with those names u dont know the intention nor who it may be named after
ayasalman 1 year ago
@ayasalman would you name your son bush because its popular? or pharoa? or tony blair? come on brother
pillgrimz 1 year ago
I dont know why dismashqiah is trying to represent ahlul sunnah when his ideology is not the viewpoint of ahlul sunnah, he follows the wahabi ideology which is a small branch of sunnah. Scholars and imams of ahlul sunnah have come out and publicily opposed dimashqiah with many of his viewpoints and clarifying that he is a wahabi, yet he goes to all these universities and decieves the muslim youth into believing his wahabi viewpoints while pretending to represent the sunnah. its a sad reality
mojy2002 1 year ago
Shia is deviance
hanysal 1 year ago
@computerfrommars not necerassirly, the companion Abu Bakr was not the very first Abu Bakr in history, so there were plently of Abu Bakr's even before his time
ayasalman 1 year ago