Always like to see more angles! I was planning at least two cameras doing time-lapse, but more is welcome.
If you shoot one frame every minute you get one second of video for every half hour that goes by. Obviously you can see what we did (above) with one frame every 30 sec... which gave us 2 seconds of video for every half hour. It's really a matter of preference and what you want the final product to look like.
Filmed then time lapsed or pictures? what was the timing you used? I was already thinking about doing this of the BHR coming out all brand new looking, before I saw this video.
@AdamDaubauew : We took stills at a rate of one shot every 30 seconds... then imported into Final Cut Pro and, BANG ZOOM! So, yup... actual timelapse is shot with a still camera whereas speeded up video is quite a different animal. We plan on doing it for when we leave the dry-dock as well.
@LHD6PAO well maybe a collaboration can be in order... me and my buddy were thinking long exposure shots every min but maybe 30sec is better. Also we wanted to have at least 2 angles.
Always like to see more angles! I was planning at least two cameras doing time-lapse, but more is welcome.
If you shoot one frame every minute you get one second of video for every half hour that goes by. Obviously you can see what we did (above) with one frame every 30 sec... which gave us 2 seconds of video for every half hour. It's really a matter of preference and what you want the final product to look like.
LHD6PAO 1 year ago
Filmed then time lapsed or pictures? what was the timing you used? I was already thinking about doing this of the BHR coming out all brand new looking, before I saw this video.
AdamDaubauew 1 year ago
@AdamDaubauew : We took stills at a rate of one shot every 30 seconds... then imported into Final Cut Pro and, BANG ZOOM! So, yup... actual timelapse is shot with a still camera whereas speeded up video is quite a different animal. We plan on doing it for when we leave the dry-dock as well.
Cheers,
MCC
LHD6PAO 1 year ago