Einstein is wrong - Drop Experiment (Fallexperiment) Bremen

Drop Experiment at the University of Bremen (ZARM) 06/21/2004. EXPERIMENTUM CRUCIS

The experiment shows the inside of an (aluminium-) drop caspule in the drop tower (110 m) of ZARM. During the fall of the test bodies (Lithium [Li], Beryllium [Be], Bor [B], Carbon [C], Aluminium [Al], Iron [Fe], Plumb [Pb]) you can see the different accelerations between the elements.

But the accepted physics says that these bodies should all have the same acceleration!

The drop experiment is the falsification of the UFF, of Galilei's law. What causes the gravitation:

http://nmkt.extra.hu/szaszgyula.pdf

Szász has discovered the elementary gravitational charges g(k) of the four stable particles electron, positron, proton and elton (so called 'antiproton') as the second fundamental physical property of the four elementary particles.

What is a positron (p)? It is a stable particle with elementary electric charge q(p) = + q and with elementary gravitational charge g(p) = + g m(e). The electron has the elementary gravitational charge g(e) = - g m(e). The elementary masses of electron and proton m(e) and m(P) are to be used in order to calculate the masses of all bodies. The universal gravitational constant is G(grav.) = g^2/4pi.

Both interactions between the particles propagate with c and the space-time structure has a Minkowski metric.

But the localisation and the velocity of the particles are never determinable exactly.

The new Law of Fall, the acceleration depends on the isotop composition, founds a NEW PHYSICS.

I inform you that a thread in Physics Forum was dispensed in which the missed experimental verification of UFF in physics was discussed.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Einstein
• Physik
• physics
• gravitation
• gravity
• experiment
• new
• theory
• space
• time

[gyulaszasz]

Iron with 1 kg gravitational mass has 0.992 kg inertial mass.

Lithium with 1 kg graviatational mass has 0.995 kg inertial mass.

[gyulaszasz]

To the difference of gravitational and inertial mass:

The gravitational mass of an electric neutral body is

m(body;g) = N(P) (m(P) - m(e)),

and the inertial mass

m(body;i) = N(P) (m(P) + m(e)) + 2 M(p) m(e) - E(bound)/c^2

is composition dependent. N(P) , M(p) are the number of protons (P) and positrons (p) in the body. m(P), m(e) the mass of proton and electron.

Only for electron, positron, proton and elton (= antiproton) are both mass equal. All particles are built of e, p, P and E.

[nicbordeaux]

Who the heck was Einstein ? What team did Newton play for ?

[againstas]

NO. F = ma Is correct, I appriciate that if a mass is traveling faster then it's mass will increase, but this does not mean that F = ma is wrong, it was perfectly right, AT THAT INSTANT OF TIME.

[FaxFatali]

@ajthrax1 as you said, they all have the same acceleration, so whats the problem?

[FaxFatali]

are you fucking kidding me? all the body masses falls with the same acceleration, because they have no mutual acceleration, however they move mutually with a constant velocity, that means they are accelerating with the same value.... right?

[gyulaszasz]

@cusanusnicolas: "My conviction on what gravity is about would predict that result, but you'll have a tough time convincing many people even if you're right, because the big money isn't about the truth."

The big money is in a new technology of energy production.

[cusanusnicolas]

@gyulaszasz Well, you may be right, but I've learned to be careful about drawing conclusions in similar experiments. My conviction on what gravity is about would predict that result, but you'll have a tough time convincing many people even if you're right, because the big money isn't about the truth. Anyway, these are very sensitive experiments, a lot of room for sampling errors, but thanks for making a contribution and keeping interest alive.