Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Dewitt Tourbillon Force Constante

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
46,111
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 5, 2008

More luxury watch reviews at http://www.goldarths.com

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • If I owned this I would just watch it all day, seriously.

  • Personally, i dont like when the outer rim of the cage is being used to drive the cage. i much prefer a petit moyenne which goes under the roue fix. that way you can bevel the edge of the cage.

see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ayuboaxx Heck- if i owned a watch like this, I would be scared to death of either LOSING it or BREAKING it-! CRUMBS, Dangermouse!

  • @lolcat23 Well, if you say so...

  • My $12.95 Casio is gonna get far greater accuracy than these things..

  • that makes me moist

  • What a quintessential melding of technology & art.

  • simply beautiful work....its art combined with past/present human ingenuity ...the people who bring these kind of time pieces to life are more than above normal humans...amazing feet(and i wear a 15)

  • @Dystopiologist seriously? please tell me more about the mechanical watch that is more accurate than quartz, I dont believe you

  • @RollaArtis "see through dial"? That's the "Spaceview"! They're still around; you should pick one up just for fun! The index wheel isn't ruby (I believe it's beryllium-bronze), but it was an engineering feat. I heard something about ruby tools used to produce it; I don't know.

  • @RollaArtis,

    You know, I think you're right - it did have a pressure-related error. I'm guessing that the air-mass around the tuning fork would cause a gain in rate as the air thinned out. But that couldn't have been much; perhaps it was worried about with regard to the space program.

    .

    But poise error was the reason it couldn't obtain a "chronometre" certificate. If the tines faced down, it gained time; if they faced up, it lost time.

  • @Dystopiologist Yes I know it was a tuning fork watch - my dad bought one of the first produced around 1965? with a see through dial, it was THE thing to have. The text book I studied years ago said that it had errors related to air pressure, I also remember the manufacture of the index wheel was problematic as it was made of artificial ruby.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more