Noam Chomsky in HARDtalk (2009) 1/3
Top Comments
All Comments (43)
-
@fronde56 i think thats becaus the guy is so shamelessly narzisistic. the show is not about the guests, its only about him looking good and soundin sophisticated... just an other media creatur nobody needs...
-
why are allt he morons here complaining thatmits all edited?its a half show oyu idiots.chomsky answers go ona dn on ,o f course ht ey have to edit the thing.good god..
-
@Sensarmy300 .lol the bbc if far superior than nay shitty us newsnchannel and it is getting bad which should open your eyes to the us news channels.
-
@Sensarmy300 The interviewer is shit, not the bbc.
-
The BBC wasted a precious thing (an interview with Noam Chomsky) by allowing this ignorant fool to interview him.
-
I disagree with chomsky's assertion that the internet is not have that big of an impact on society. I think what we are seeing now with the occupy wall street movement is a demographic largely influenced by the internet for better and for worse.
-
Why go to all the bother of arranging to talk to Noam Chomsky and then talking over him and constantly interrupting.This guy did exactly the same thing with Slavoj Zizek.What a waste of time and the questions were nothing short of banal.
-
Long live Chomsky. Justice, truth, freedom, rolled in one.
-
interviewer is a dick...
Chomsky's answers seem heavily edited. Sackur's questions do not.
jabbaduhut 2 years ago 39
why won't this guy let Chomsky answer the questions? Seems kind of rude.
fronde56 2 years ago 33