99-1 just awsome............i remember winning with a horse that was 99-1 it was an amazing feeling. In harness it may have been a non winner but hearing people tell me and my pop you got no shot tonight and winning was nice ........my dad was a horse hobbyist and got no respect from the public because he trained his own horses at dover downs. I love the underdogs!
If history is any guide, he was a lower price in Europe than his US odds, which were 133-1. Besides if he were in Europe, his money would have been less than 1:1 and he would have never cashed for $35000. I stand by my earlier comments....... LIAR!!!!
You obviously didn't bet him, because he wasn't 199 to 1 he was 133 to 1. If you are going to lie to make yourself look smart, at least get your facts right.
He won a very solid win ... so strongly won.
And at over 99-1 odds! Whew and wowsa.
cheeriosinabowl 8 months ago
I had him at over 200-1 in the off-track pools (Suffolk Downs in Boston, MA) . So, 199-1 is possible at the simulcast sites.
NewGoldDream09 2 years ago
99-1 just awsome............i remember winning with a horse that was 99-1 it was an amazing feeling. In harness it may have been a non winner but hearing people tell me and my pop you got no shot tonight and winning was nice ........my dad was a horse hobbyist and got no respect from the public because he trained his own horses at dover downs. I love the underdogs!
BIGRED224FOREVER 2 years ago
If history is any guide, he was a lower price in Europe than his US odds, which were 133-1. Besides if he were in Europe, his money would have been less than 1:1 and he would have never cashed for $35000. I stand by my earlier comments....... LIAR!!!!
Kdole923 4 years ago
Now I'm not saying he did back Arcangues, but it's very possible he wasn't 133-1 with the Euro bookmakers.
Kitan1 4 years ago
Yeah, lol, I love it when jackasses lie to try to make it look like they know something and they can't even remember the winning odds. Classic. LMAO
ghostzapper2006 4 years ago
Arcangues had beaten former "superhorse" Arazi by six lengths, six weeks before this race.
raygordon 4 years ago
You obviously didn't bet him, because he wasn't 199 to 1 he was 133 to 1. If you are going to lie to make yourself look smart, at least get your facts right.
Kdole923 4 years ago
Arcangues 4-ever
WhenTheBellRings0908 4 years ago
just typo
sorry 4 mis-understanding........
BeATrillionaire 4 years ago