Nightline - Creationism Vs. Evolution Debate (Part 4/4)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
506 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 8, 2010

Nightline's Martin Bashir hosts a debate between the RRS and Kirk Cameron/Ray Comfort.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Even though I believe the body is well designed I have witnessed two different argumants based on wether the body is well designed or not. Because the body breaks down and requires such exact conditions that proves it is well designed because of small odds of those conditions and otherwise would be abd design. Because the body is robust enough to compensate for inexact conditions proves good design for environment and a delecate design would be bad. There are many ways to think about this.

  • Whatever the truth is it can't be kept unknown forever people will eventually find out. It's amazing what a lamen understanding the audience has over these important issues. They act like the good things the body can do and the bad things that happen to the body make or break wether it is designed or wether there is a God of any kind. The fact that bad things happen is almost a destraction to the issue.

  • People should never be persecuted or harassed just because they believe a faith but the fact that Christains have been so persecuted is a red flag that maybe they are doing something right. I'm not saying being persecuted is a sign you are right but people will only go that far for a reason. If people don't like a beliefe that much they should instead debate it with reason.

  • @csgforme You're putting a random question on some youtube video and I take the time out of my busy day to try to answer it, or at least to give you a starting point for investigating this very intricate topic further on your own i.e. you could have read up on sociality and realised that genetic traits do not have to be helping the individual's reproduction to be propagated. Instead you just knit-picked at my analogy and gave yourself a reason to dismiss my response. So yeah, you're being silly

  • @ASKaPHYSICIST

    So.... I ask a question, and hope for an answer.... and thats silly???

    Thats terribly confusing coming from someone who encourages the "ask"ing of questions. Please stop with the bafoonery.

  • @csgforme I assure you, you're the only one looking silly here.

  • @ASKaPHYSICIST

    If you didnt have a response based on fact, you should have just left it alone... now you look silly because of your name and all.

  • @csgforme here's a bright idea: read it up yourself!

  • @ASKaPHYSICIST

    Its not a similar question at all. Infertile bees cannot reproduce with either gender. Also, there parents weren't infertile, and there will never be offspring, infertile or fertile.

    The rest of your reply seems like an unfounded guess.

    I was hoping for a factual response.

  • @csgforme good question, it's similar how infertile bees are so common. It's about sociality: The survival of the species depends on more than the procreation of it's individuals. Having homosexuals in your society may well give you other advantages, which makes a species that is able to produce homosexual offspring more successful than one that does not.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more