Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
dogs dont have the same nutritional value as chickens, nor do they produce eggs (well, edible shelled ones if you want to get all literal)
They were brought up as a domesticated animal for protection and companionship. granted they do eat dogs in certain countries like korea, but its a delicacy and is not mass produced
I believe the first responder answering your first question. You can't communicate with infants. Should we beat them to death too? And are you seriously accusing a chicken of being racist? That's pathetic. Alright, to answer your question, yes I would still defend them. Brutally murdering an animal can't even compare to him/her being "racist".
alright, first I'd like to thank you for actually responding to my comment with an answer relevant to it infants cant defend themselves (at least not that I know of), sure. but they're infants. you raise them to become intelligent, productive human beings. you cant do that with a chicken. all you can raise it to be is, well, a chicken. it cant form a civilization or a society, it cant make tools or technology, and it cant form things like language or trade and currency. they are inferior to us
and therefore, we have every right to domesticate and and use them for food and other products. its not like racism or other forms of bigotry where we think we're "better" than them. we are a more advanced species. and if they cant defend themselves in the slightest bit or revolt, then there is no stopping us
oh and this is for zeldalink3211, for some reason I couldnt reply further in that chain of comments
Well thank you go being calm and intelligent when responding to my comment. My opinion is, I don't think because chickens are tasty, and since us humans are stronger than them, that we have the right to slaughter and ingest them at our will. They cannot defend for them self, and killing them just because we think they taste good, is wrong. Humans are smart (for the most part) and we don't need to rely on the killing of other animals to survive.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
They were brought up as a domesticated animal for protection and companionship. granted they do eat dogs in certain countries like korea, but its a delicacy and is not mass produced
infants cant defend themselves (at least not that I know of), sure. but they're infants. you raise them to become intelligent, productive human beings. you cant do that with a chicken. all you can raise it to be is, well, a chicken. it cant form a civilization or a society, it cant make tools or technology, and it cant form things like language or trade and currency. they are inferior to us
oh and this is for zeldalink3211, for some reason I couldnt reply further in that chain of comments