Only Ron Paul is willing
Uploader Comments (ukipwebmaster)
All Comments (46)
-
@exitsattherear and the reason you came here, watched this video and told us that is?????
-
Ron Paul is a cunt, in a long line of cunts past and present.
-
@ukipwebmaster and?????? If the plan doesnt work exactly as expected then adjust your plan to fit the situation.
I do have to thnak you for letting me post my comments even though are they are against Ron Paul. Thanks
-
@freefalable The Islamists supported the Shah in 1953. 1953 didnt have a thing to do with 1979 because the Islamists all wanted Mossadegh dead and after the Islamic revolution they killed everyone in Mossadeghs party. The Islamists supported the Shah until 1963 when the Shah gave women the right to vote. That is when the Islamists first attempted to overthrow the Shah. If the Shah never gave women the right to vote the Islamic revolution would never have taken place in 1979.
-
@knight4justice It is a complete lie to say our removing their democratically elected leader in 1953 and replacing him with an authoritarian leader made no difference.
-
Ron Paul is a Freedom Growth in your Soul and he is getting stronger
-
@ukipwebmaster im living in uk - non citizen, i follow international politics and i love ukip policies agenda and people - i would like to thank you for spreading info of Ron Paul - cos as i see US political influence because of corruption and is obvious everywhere and i believe Ron Paul would be big help to the resistance movement ( not truth movement as truth is not relative but differs) Thanks to everyone who tries to do good deeds in thes fowl world
-
@knight4justice The best laid plans of mice and men invariably go pear shaped....
-
@RMMHS4RP Khomeini supported the Shah in 1953. Ayatollah Kashani turned on Mossadegh in 1953 and said he needed to be executed. When the 1979 Revolution happened, Khomeini declared everyone in Mossadeghs National Front party to be apostates and ordered them all to be executed.
It is a complete lie for anyone to say the 1979 Iran revolution happened because of previous American intervention.
-
For a second there, I was confused as to whether Sarah Palin actually had some intelligence or not, but as she kept talking, her talk of Israel, then putting Paul and Gingrich on the same level... yeah, same old Sarah.
Foreign policy? Without Ron Paul's economic policy we are destined for total collapse. Then there will be no money for defense much less never-ending intervention. No economy and no military. Not an appealing prospect. The choice is peace and prosperity or depression and tyranny.
carcabe 1 month ago
@carcabe In a way Ron Paul could still be slightly ahead of his time. Give a few more years and those pennies will start to drop.
ukipwebmaster 1 month ago
This isolationist propoganda is beyond believe. So basically, if countries are not invading and meddling in the internal affairs of other countries, they are all isolationists....gawd
TheAwedax 1 month ago 11
@TheAwedax Whether or not you agree or disagree with 'isolationism' and the interpretation of same, America has to wake up that whoever wins the next presidency it will no longer be business as usual. Do the math as Americans say and only Ron Paul is confronting this issue.
ukipwebmaster 1 month ago 5