I love and hate you guys, at the same time. ;) I try, on a regular basis, to find bias on your videos. I fail miserably 98% of the time. :) Congratulations on being levelheaded and equally biting to each side, even my own. :)
I agree, we shouldn't wait. But I think resolving the situation through dialog between our leaders is the best way to go about it. If Iran is so dangerous we could have prevented their president from coming in our boarders. We talked to Saddam in the 80's, was he legit? We used diplomacy with North Korea. It's a huge double standard. We're initiating the standoff by claiming they're not legit.
I respect your opinion but I think you're paranoid. How do you resolve disputes if you don't talk? War
Do we want to wait until Iran IS capable of launching a weapon at us, or should we nip it in the bud? hmmmmm. Also, our political leaders don't invite him to the country, our leftist university deans do. Also, the UN in New York. Talking to him legitamizes what he says. Our top leaders can't do that. We know he wants to harm our allies, and is seeking nuclear enrichment...it's not hard to piece that puzzle together. We must be prepared to act first, and hope it doesn't come to that.
I'm aware, they still haven't enriched it yet. And they're still a ways away from a nuke, much less one that could reach the US. You're missing the point. To insinuate that Iran poses a threat anywhere near the level of the USSR is a joke.
Iran isn't a bunch of terrorists. We'll allow their president to visit our country and address Americans, but our own leaders can't talk with them? The notion that not talking with them is somehow protecting us is ridiculous. NOT talking is more dangerous.
have you missed the stories about iran setting up deals with russia to enrich uranium? if all we're hearing about is the deal, what do you think is going on that we don't hear about?
i think it's more commonly viewed on its website. but yeah, i also agree that the views are too low considering how high the views are for some of these other stupid campaign videos.
This is one of the most important shows on youtube. I can't believe the views are so low. Shame on you YouTube for not promoting such relevant material! These webcasts should be viewed by millions, not hundreds! Get it out there!!
I love and hate you guys, at the same time. ;) I try, on a regular basis, to find bias on your videos. I fail miserably 98% of the time. :) Congratulations on being levelheaded and equally biting to each side, even my own. :)
-Axel
axelfear 3 years ago
I agree, we shouldn't wait. But I think resolving the situation through dialog between our leaders is the best way to go about it. If Iran is so dangerous we could have prevented their president from coming in our boarders. We talked to Saddam in the 80's, was he legit? We used diplomacy with North Korea. It's a huge double standard. We're initiating the standoff by claiming they're not legit.
I respect your opinion but I think you're paranoid. How do you resolve disputes if you don't talk? War
CircleLimit4 3 years ago
Do we want to wait until Iran IS capable of launching a weapon at us, or should we nip it in the bud? hmmmmm. Also, our political leaders don't invite him to the country, our leftist university deans do. Also, the UN in New York. Talking to him legitamizes what he says. Our top leaders can't do that. We know he wants to harm our allies, and is seeking nuclear enrichment...it's not hard to piece that puzzle together. We must be prepared to act first, and hope it doesn't come to that.
thatbamma 3 years ago
I'm aware, they still haven't enriched it yet. And they're still a ways away from a nuke, much less one that could reach the US. You're missing the point. To insinuate that Iran poses a threat anywhere near the level of the USSR is a joke.
Iran isn't a bunch of terrorists. We'll allow their president to visit our country and address Americans, but our own leaders can't talk with them? The notion that not talking with them is somehow protecting us is ridiculous. NOT talking is more dangerous.
CircleLimit4 3 years ago
have you missed the stories about iran setting up deals with russia to enrich uranium? if all we're hearing about is the deal, what do you think is going on that we don't hear about?
thatbamma 3 years ago
The USSR had a plethora of nukes, all of which could reach the US. Iran has none. They haven't even begun enriching uranium.
CircleLimit4 3 years ago
i think it's more commonly viewed on its website. but yeah, i also agree that the views are too low considering how high the views are for some of these other stupid campaign videos.
kookooktchoo 3 years ago
This is one of the most important shows on youtube. I can't believe the views are so low. Shame on you YouTube for not promoting such relevant material! These webcasts should be viewed by millions, not hundreds! Get it out there!!
jayellesea 3 years ago
i'm confused by your tactics...
are you saying that I misstated facts or that the channel did?
thatbamma 3 years ago
Do you see the irony of misstating facts on the factcheck channel?
krammitAll 3 years ago