911 Aircraft(175) is still flying AFTER it has 'crashed' into the WTC.

Kudos to SEATNINEB for this.
Check forum here at:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=14399

FAA radar is tracking, in real time, flight 175 after it has
supposedly crashed into the WTC. This is perhaps an hour later.
Although many people do not believe an aircraft
hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still
cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help.

3 IFR aircraft in the air in a 30 mile radius of New york city is consistent with one hour of diversions and forced landings.

One hour before you would expect a very large multiple of 3 aircraft to be in the air. NY has several incredibly busy airports.Check anytime on FLIGHT AWARE and count the aircraft within a 30 mile radius of NY. There should be 60 to 100.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• 911
• no
• planes
• faa
• radar
• flight
• 175
• simonshack
• september
• clues
• bush
• tv
• fakery
• failblog
• fail
• msnbc
• skyarcher

[AllTimeAesthetic]

@haastaboozia There was no wreckage from a plane in the Pennsylvania field... just look at pictures of the crash site. Try to explain where that went.

[haastaboozia]

That's right, the U.S. government declared they were going to create a crisis and blew up the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and downed an aircraft into a field in PA. Yeah, I believe all you idiots. Get a grip people and stop looking for b.s.

[babybry311]

That looked like 125

Not 175

[bartman5347]

@TheClancy1997 Simple. Records, records, and more records. All the records from the SEC Investigations, the missing 2.3 trillion from the D.O.D, etc. etc. The F.B.I. records on terrorism, etc. etc.

[TheClancy1997]

@bartman5347 True, but why would they want to destroy it.

[bartman5347]

@TheClancy1997 Thanks. Now think about WTC7: No plane crash, no jet fuel, just some small fires.

[TheClancy1997]

@bartman5347 yeah I guess you have a point

[bartman5347]

@TheClancy1997 #1: Most the jet fuel was gone moments after impact in the ensuing fireball. #2: They only burn at that temperature under optimum conditions. #3: The fires would have had to burn for several hours at these temperatures before any of the steel would begin to weaken. #4: Even had they burned for hours, and weakened the steel, the remaining floors under them were more than able to support the load. Therefore, the worst thing that should have taken place was the top floors toppling.

[TheClancy1997]

@bartman5347 think about this. the planes crashed disintegrated and took a lot of the fire retarded insulation off of the beams and girders."Today jet fuels burn at about 1800 degrees and have a high flashpoint of 120 degrees. This means that when a person is refueling an aircraft, even on the hottest summer day, it would be difficult to ignite the fuel." this is from a report by Gaines Arnold. Steel starts to weaken at 1400 degrees. so that is why I believe the towers collapsed. feedback plz

[bartman5347]

@trigsim Jet fuel does NOT burn at a high enough temperature to melt the steel used in the buildings, not to mention they were both on fire less than two hours. YOU need to stop believing whatever the government provides as facts and think for yourself.