SELMER vs P. MAURIAT
Uploader Comments (moscowmariachi)
All Comments (13)
-
Новые производители не спорят с Selmer. Они просто предлагают что-то другое, и находят своих поклонников, в том чисте и среди мега-профессионалов. Этот тест просто показывает разницу в звучании. Кому что нравится, как Вы видите из комментариев...
-
Этот тест субъективен.Профи извлекут заук из любого инструмента.Если было бы тестирование"вслепую",то стало бы яснее.На сегодняшний день 90% звезд играют на Селмерах.И с этим не поспоришь.
-
WhAt's the song name?
-
@robertzzzzz yes, quite right.
-
Yep the Mauriats are much more fat and allow you much more nuances...
-
This is sweet! I think it sounds like they're using more air support on the P. Mauriat time through? Ya never know, could be the recording. I prefer the selmer sound, I think it blends better, but the P. Mauriat is fatter. They used less vibrato on the selmer run through. Selmer sounds more vintage, the P. Mauriat sounds more contemporary.
I really love the Selmer sound... That'd fit much better when playing in a bigband, and that is the main place to find these sax sections.
They leave some room for the other horn sections and the rythm section, the p. mauriats just fill it all up.
On the other hand, that p. mauriat sound would be really nice for some sax solos.
robbertzzzzz 9 months ago
@robbertzzzzz
Thank you for your posting.
Lot's of saxophonists would agree with you
moscowmariachi 9 months ago
This is fun! I noticed that the selmer section sounded smoother while the P.Mauriat section were "beefier".
rnordling 1 year ago
@rnordling
Yes, right. Selmers part sounds poorer. P. Mauriat's part is more luxury in my opinion
moscowmariachi 1 year ago