LOL | David Mitchell's Soapbox
Top Comments
All Comments (1,164)
-
@raptorjesus11 and I would gladly accept, shame on me.
-
@fearthegeeklord If David Mitchell were here he would give you a thorough bitchslapping for your use of where instead of were.
-
Ah, the days when youtube comments where limited to 503 characters, I remember them well...
-
lol
-
Sarcasm in written form is purely subjective on the reader's part. I read "lol" with far more sarcasm than I do "haha".
Furthermore, you can do more with "haha" to suggest or deny a sarcastic reading. For instance, "Ha. Ha. Ha." is clearly suggesting slow, mocking, disingenuous laughter, whereas "Haha!" is more likely to be a genuine display of amusement.
With "lol" you have: "Lol", "LOL" or "looooooooooooolllllllllllllll
ololll". All of which are, essentially, bollocks. -
IRTWISTAMCBABYHYTSIYC
-
Yes, the pig would probably make a bad waiter, too!
-
LOL, love David Mitchell
-
I use smilies as a end to a message to show that if we were talking face to face I would be giving them a friendly smile, or in conveying my own cheerfulness. For example "I've had a lovely day :)" I agree that using them at the end of a joke is rather like laughing at your own joke. It makes you an idiot.
-
:-)
I use smileys to illustrate the mood of the sentence, because it's too easy to for people to misconstrue your meaning over text
iDaarnR 2 weeks ago 41
I did actually lol, after David said lol.
;D
CultureShockSix 1 week ago 4